StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. DVC vs Git

DVC vs Git

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git
Git
Stacks343.6K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K
DVC
DVC
Stacks57
Followers91
Votes2
GitHub Stars15.1K
Forks1.3K

DVC vs Git: What are the differences?

h2 { font-size: 24px; }

h3 { font-size: 20px; }

h4 { font-size: 18px; }

h5 { font-size: 16px; }

p { margin: 0 0 10px; }

code { font-family: Consolas, monaco, monospace; font-size: 12px; background-color: #f9f9f9; padding: 2px 4px; color: #333333; }

Differences Between DVC and Git

DVC (Data Version Control) and Git are both version control tools, but they serve different purposes and have some key differences:

1. Data vs Code:

DVC is specifically designed for version controlling data and machine learning models, whereas Git is primarily used for tracking changes in code. DVC provides a separate layer of version control for large datasets, facilitating reproducibility and collaboration in data science projects.

2. File Organization:

In Git, all files and directories are tracked as a whole, and any changes to files within a directory are treated as changes to the entire directory. On the other hand, DVC tracks individual files separately, allowing more flexibility in managing and versioning specific datasets or models.

3. File Storage:

Git stores all file versions locally on the user's machine, resulting in a large repository size for projects with numerous and large files. In contrast, DVC stores data files and models externally, reducing the repository size and enabling efficient sharing and collaboration by referencing the storage locations rather than storing the actual files.

4. Time Complexity:

When working with large datasets, Git can become slow as it needs to check the entire repository for changes during each commit. DVC, by separating data versioning from code versioning, reduces the time complexity in managing and tracking large datasets, allowing for faster commits and better performance.

5. Collaboration:

Git provides robust mechanisms for collaborative code development, such as branches, merging, and pull requests. While DVC can also facilitate collaboration by versioning data, its collaboration capabilities are more focused on facilitating the sharing and reproducibility of data and models rather than the collaborative development of code.

6. Integration:

Git seamlessly integrates with various development tools and platforms, making it widely adopted in the software development community. DVC, on the other hand, has a more specialized focus on data science workflows and integrates with popular machine learning frameworks, cloud storage providers, and ML experiment tracking tools.

In Summary, DVC and Git have key differences regarding their intended use, file organization, storage approach, time complexity, collaboration capabilities, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git
Git
DVC
DVC

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

-
Git-compatible; Storage agnostic; Reproducible; Low friction branching; Metric tracking; ML pipeline framework; Language- & framework-agnostic; HDFS, Hive & Apache Spark; Track failures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Stars
15.1K
GitHub Forks
26.9K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
343.6K
Stacks
57
Followers
184.2K
Followers
91
Votes
6.6K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
Pros
  • 2
    Full reproducibility
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't scale for big data
  • 1
    Requires working locally with the data
  • 1
    Coupling between orchestration and version control
Integrations
No integrations available
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Google Drive
Google Drive
PyTorch
PyTorch
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Python
Python
Julia
Julia
TensorFlow
TensorFlow

What are some alternatives to Git, DVC?

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

Magit

Magit

It is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. It aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that it wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only deserve to be called porcelains.

Replicate

Replicate

It lets you run machine learning models with a few lines of code, without needing to understand how machine learning works.

isomorphic-git

isomorphic-git

It is a pure JavaScript reimplementation of git that works in both Node.js and browser JavaScript environments. It can read and write to git repositories, fetch from and push to git remotes (such as GitHub), all without any native C++ module dependencies.

Gitless

Gitless

Gitless is an experiment to see what happens if you put a simple veneer on an app that changes the underlying concepts. Because Gitless is implemented on top of Git (could be considered what Git pros call a "porcelain" of Git), you can always fall back on Git.

Git Reflow

Git Reflow

Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

BitKeeper

BitKeeper

BitKeeper is a fast, enterprise-ready, distributed SCM that scales up to very large projects and down to tiny ones.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana