StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Lumen

Echo vs Lumen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lumen
Lumen
Stacks429
Followers673
Votes161
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks992
Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K

Echo vs Lumen: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Here are the key differences between Echo and Lumen:

1. **Routing**: Echo provides a more expressive and flexible routing system compared to Lumen, allowing for more intricate route definitions and URL patterns.
  
2. **Middleware**: Lumen offers a streamlined middleware handling mechanism, making it easier to manage HTTP requests and responses with middleware functions, while Echo requires manual configuration for middleware usage.
  
3. **Performance**: Lumen is known for its lightweight and high-performance nature, optimized for speed and efficiency, making it a preferred choice for microservices and small-scale applications over Echo.
  
4. **Community Support**: Echo has a larger community and ecosystem with extensive documentation and third-party packages, whereas Lumen's community is comparatively smaller, which might impact the availability of resources and support.
  
5. **Built-in Features**: Echo provides a wide range of built-in features and helpers for common web development tasks, while Lumen offers a more minimalistic approach, allowing developers to add only the necessary components for their projects.
  
6. **Use Cases**: Lumen is often recommended for building APIs and microservices due to its lightweight design and fast performance, while Echo is favored for web applications that require richer features and complex routing configurations.

In Summary, Echo and Lumen differ in routing capabilities, middleware handling, performance, community support, built-in features, and ideal use cases based on project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lumen
Lumen
Echo
Echo

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

-
Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
992
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
429
Stacks
346
Followers
673
Followers
187
Votes
161
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 38
    API
  • 28
    Microframework
  • 19
    MVC
  • 16
    PHP
  • 12
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Not fast
  • 2
    PHP
  • 1
    Not fast with MongoDB
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 10
    Performance
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Lumen, Echo?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase