StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Sapper

Echo vs Sapper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K
Sapper
Sapper
Stacks41
Followers56
Votes0

Echo vs Sapper: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Here are the key differences between Echo and Sapper:

1. **Framework Type**: Echo is a lightweight and high-performance web framework for Go while Sapper is a framework for building web applications with Svelte.
2. **Programming Language**: Echo is written in Go, whereas Sapper is written using JavaScript.
3. **Routing**: Echo uses a standard approach to routing with parameters and middleware, while Sapper uses file-based routing and server-side rendering.
4. **Server-Side Rendering**: Sapper offers built-in support for server-side rendering, which is not a primary focus in Echo.
5. **File Structure**: Sapper follows a file-system-based approach where pages are stored in the pages directory, while Echo does not enforce any specific file structure for organizing code.
6. **Usage**: Echo is commonly used for building RESTful APIs and microservices, whereas Sapper is more suitable for building dynamic web applications with reactive components.

In Summary, Echo and Sapper differ in terms of framework type, programming language, routing, server-side rendering, file structure, and usage.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Echo
Echo
Sapper
Sapper

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Sapper focuses on easy of use. It is alpha now and only compiled with rust nightly.

Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Async, based on hyper mio branch; Sapper supplies only basic framework; Sapper only processes small request and response (with small request body, returning small response body) now; Three level granularity (global, module, function handler) middleware controller and unified middleware presentation; Typesafe abstraction, keep the same spirit with hyper; For easy using, will supply some convenient macros to help write business logic; Global object cross requests;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
346
Stacks
41
Followers
187
Followers
56
Votes
59
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 10
    Performance
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 0
    Less bundle Size
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Echo, Sapper?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase