StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. EJS vs Twig

EJS vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8
EJS
EJS
Stacks522
Followers359
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks859

EJS vs Twig: What are the differences?

Key Differences between EJS and Twig

EJS and Twig are both template engines used for server-side rendering in web development. They have a few key differences that set them apart in terms of syntax, features, and performance.

  1. Syntax: One of the major differences between EJS and Twig is their syntax. EJS uses plain JavaScript embedded within <% %> tags, which allows developers to write dynamic code using JavaScript logic. On the other hand, Twig uses a more structured and readable syntax that resembles Django or Jinja2 templates. Twig uses curly braces {{ }} and control structures like {% %} to define template logic.

  2. Security: Another significant difference between EJS and Twig is the focus on security. Twig places a strong emphasis on security and automatically escapes all output to prevent XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) attacks by default. EJS, however, does not have this auto-escaping feature built-in, and developers need to manually escape data to ensure security. This makes Twig a safer choice for handling user-generated content.

  3. Performance: In terms of performance, EJS is generally faster than Twig. EJS compiles the templates to JavaScript functions, which are then executed to generate the HTML output. This compilation process improves performance by reducing the parsing and rendering time. Twig, on the other hand, compiles templates to PHP code, which may have a higher overhead compared to JavaScript. However, the difference in performance may vary depending on the specific use case and the optimizations employed.

  4. Filters and Functions: Twig provides a rich set of built-in filters and functions that can be used to manipulate data within templates. These filters and functions offer various string manipulation, formatting, and other utility operations. EJS, on the other hand, does not have a similar concept of built-in filters and functions. Instead, developers need to rely on JavaScript methods and libraries to achieve the desired data transformations.

  5. Built-in features: EJS and Twig also differ in terms of the built-in features they offer. EJS provides features like partials, includes, and layout support, which make it easy to reuse templates and modularize code. Twig, on the other hand, includes advanced features like template inheritance, blocks, macros, and internationalization support, which allow for more advanced template structuring and customization.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: EJS and Twig both have active developer communities and ecosystems, but they differ in terms of popularity and usage. EJS is more widely used in the JavaScript ecosystem, especially with Node.js applications, while Twig is a popular choice in the PHP community. The size and maturity of the community can affect the availability of resources, third-party libraries, and community support for these template engines.

In Summary, EJS and Twig differ in syntax, security features, performance, built-in features, and community support. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the appropriate template engine based on their specific requirements and the technology stack they are working with.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Twig
Twig
EJS
EJS

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
859
Stacks
382
Stacks
522
Followers
157
Followers
359
Votes
8
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
Pros
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Twig, EJS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase