Entropic vs npm

Overview

npm

Stacks137.4K

Followers82.2K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars17.6K

Forks3.0K

Entropic

Stacks3

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks149

Entropic vs npm: What are the differences?

Installation Process: Entropic uses a decentralized installation process, where packages are fetched from multiple sources, making it more resilient to outages and faster. npm, on the other hand, relies on a centralized registry for package installation.
Marketplace Integration: Entropic is designed to work well with small and medium-sized communities, providing a marketplace for discovering and sharing packages within those specific communities. npm, on the contrary, is more widely used in the open-source community and integrates with the official npm package registry.
Support for Offline Usage: Entropic offers better support for offline development by caching packages locally and allowing users to work without an internet connection. npm requires an internet connection to download packages from the centralized registry.
Versioning Control: Entropic provides a decentralized versioning system that allows users to manage package versions independently, enabling greater flexibility and control over dependencies. npm follows a centralized versioning approach where packages are versioned in the npm registry.
Licenses and Legal Compliance: Entropic promotes open-source licenses and legal compliance by encouraging developers to publish packages with clear licensing information and ensuring that packages are not violating any legal regulations. npm also supports licenses but does not enforce legal compliance as strictly as Entropic.
Community Support: Entropic emphasizes building strong communities around specific packages or projects, fostering collaboration and support within those communities. npm has a larger and more diverse user base, providing a broader range of packages and support but potentially less focused community engagement.

In Summary, Entropic and npm differ in their installation process, marketplace integration, support for offline usage, versioning control, licenses and legal compliance, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on npm, Entropic

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

Reviewon

React

TypeScript

Yarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm	Entropic
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.	It is a new package registry with a new CLI, designed to be easy to stand up inside your network. It features an entirely new file-centric API and a content-addressable storage system that attempts to minimize the amount of data you must retrieve over a network. This file-centric approach also applies to the publication API.
-	CLI; content-addressable storage system;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 17.6K	GitHub Stars 5.3K
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks 149
Stacks 137.4K	Stacks 3
Followers 82.2K	Followers 12
Votes 1.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 648 Best package management system for javascript 382 Open-source 327 Great community 148 More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist 112 Nice people matter Cons 5 Bad at package versioning and being deterministic 5 Problems with lockfiles 3 Node-gyp takes forever 1 Super slow	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to npm, Entropic?

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Browserify-CDN

Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.

Related Comparisons

Entropic vs npm: What are the differences?

Installation Process: Entropic uses a decentralized installation process, where packages are fetched from multiple sources, making it more resilient to outages and faster. npm, on the other hand, relies on a centralized registry for package installation.
Marketplace Integration: Entropic is designed to work well with small and medium-sized communities, providing a marketplace for discovering and sharing packages within those specific communities. npm, on the contrary, is more widely used in the open-source community and integrates with the official npm package registry.
Support for Offline Usage: Entropic offers better support for offline development by caching packages locally and allowing users to work without an internet connection. npm requires an internet connection to download packages from the centralized registry.
Versioning Control: Entropic provides a decentralized versioning system that allows users to manage package versions independently, enabling greater flexibility and control over dependencies. npm follows a centralized versioning approach where packages are versioned in the npm registry.
Licenses and Legal Compliance: Entropic promotes open-source licenses and legal compliance by encouraging developers to publish packages with clear licensing information and ensuring that packages are not violating any legal regulations. npm also supports licenses but does not enforce legal compliance as strictly as Entropic.
Community Support: Entropic emphasizes building strong communities around specific packages or projects, fostering collaboration and support within those communities. npm has a larger and more diverse user base, providing a broader range of packages and support but potentially less focused community engagement.

In Summary, Entropic and npm differ in their installation process, marketplace integration, support for offline usage, versioning control, licenses and legal compliance, and community support.

Entropic vs npm

Overview