Eureka vs Keepalived

Overview

Eureka

Stacks291

Followers779

Votes70

GitHub Stars12.7K

Forks3.8K

Keepalived

Stacks36

Followers59

Votes6

Eureka vs Keepalived: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of distributed systems and high availability, tools like Eureka and Keepalived are crucial for maintaining stability and facilitating seamless failover mechanisms.

Architecture: Eureka is a service registry tool used for service discovery in microservices architecture, while Keepalived is a routing software designed for Linux-based systems to provide high availability by monitoring and managing virtual IP addresses.
Protocol: Eureka uses the REST-based protocol for service registration and discovery, while Keepalived utilizes the VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) to ensure network redundancy and failover in case of node failures.
Language Support: Eureka is primarily designed for Java applications and offers seamless integration with Spring Cloud, making it ideal for microservices development in Java ecosystem. On the other hand, Keepalived can be used with any Linux-based system irrespective of the programming language used.
Clustering: Eureka comes with built-in support for clustering, allowing multiple Eureka servers to communicate and replicate service registry information for fault tolerance. Keepalived, on the other hand, focuses on IP failover and does not inherently support clustering of multiple instances.
Use Cases: Eureka is more suitable for cloud-native applications built on microservices architecture that require dynamic service discovery and load balancing, while Keepalived is preferred for network infrastructure where failover mechanisms for virtual IP addresses are essential to ensure continuous service availability.
Community Support: Eureka is an open-source project maintained by Netflix and boasts a vibrant community of developers and contributors, ensuring regular updates and enhancements. Keepalived, being an open-source project as well, has a dedicated community but may not have the same level of widespread adoption and support compared to Eureka.

In Summary, Eureka and Keepalived differ in architecture, protocol, language support, clustering capabilities, use cases, and community support, catering to distinct needs in the realm of high availability and failover mechanisms in distributed systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Eureka	Keepalived
Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.	The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.
-	High availability; Job Scheduling,
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 291	Stacks 36
Followers 779	Followers 59
Votes 70	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud 9 Web ui 8 Health checking 8 Monitoring 7 Circuit breaker Cons 1 Nada	Pros 2 Load Balancer 2 Extremely fast (IPVS) 1 Virtual IP HA with VRRP 1 2 nodes HA cluster management
Integrations
Amazon EC2	Linux HAProxy

What are some alternatives to Eureka, Keepalived?

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

SkyDNS

SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).

SmartStack

Scaling a web infrastructure requires services, and building a service-oriented infrastructure is hard. Make it EASY, with SmartStack’s automated, transparent service discovery and registration: cruise control for your distributed infrastructure.

Serf

Serf is a service discovery and orchestration tool that is decentralized, highly available, and fault tolerant. Serf runs on every major platform: Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. It is extremely lightweight: it uses 5 to 10 MB of resident memory and primarily communicates using infrequent UDP messages.

Nacos

It is an easy-to-use dynamic service discovery, configuration and service management platform for building cloud native applications.

Libraries.io

It is an open source web service that lists software development project dependencies and alerts developers to new versions of the software libraries they are using.

ODD Platform

It is a next-generation data discovery and observability tool for enterprises and startups that help to efficiently democratize data, powers collaboration of data science and data engineering teams, significantly reduces time to data discovery, cuts on data downtime and offers a modern, easy-to-use environment with quick time-to-value. It makes all your data entities reliable, observable, and easily discoverable.

Vyne

Vyne automates the integration & orchestration of your services on-the-fly, ensuring you can always get stuff done, regardless of how your services evolve.

Related Comparisons

Eureka vs Keepalived: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of distributed systems and high availability, tools like Eureka and Keepalived are crucial for maintaining stability and facilitating seamless failover mechanisms.

Architecture: Eureka is a service registry tool used for service discovery in microservices architecture, while Keepalived is a routing software designed for Linux-based systems to provide high availability by monitoring and managing virtual IP addresses.
Protocol: Eureka uses the REST-based protocol for service registration and discovery, while Keepalived utilizes the VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) to ensure network redundancy and failover in case of node failures.
Language Support: Eureka is primarily designed for Java applications and offers seamless integration with Spring Cloud, making it ideal for microservices development in Java ecosystem. On the other hand, Keepalived can be used with any Linux-based system irrespective of the programming language used.
Clustering: Eureka comes with built-in support for clustering, allowing multiple Eureka servers to communicate and replicate service registry information for fault tolerance. Keepalived, on the other hand, focuses on IP failover and does not inherently support clustering of multiple instances.
Use Cases: Eureka is more suitable for cloud-native applications built on microservices architecture that require dynamic service discovery and load balancing, while Keepalived is preferred for network infrastructure where failover mechanisms for virtual IP addresses are essential to ensure continuous service availability.
Community Support: Eureka is an open-source project maintained by Netflix and boasts a vibrant community of developers and contributors, ensuring regular updates and enhancements. Keepalived, being an open-source project as well, has a dedicated community but may not have the same level of widespread adoption and support compared to Eureka.

Eureka vs Keepalived

Overview

Eureka vs Keepalived: What are the differences?