StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Fat-Free vs Twig

Fat-Free vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fat-Free
Fat-Free
Stacks39
Followers51
Votes41
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks443
Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8

Fat-Free vs Twig: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Fat-Free and Twig are two popular templating engines used in web development. While both serve the same purpose of separating code from design, they have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Syntax: One major difference between Fat-Free and Twig is their syntax. Fat-Free uses PHP syntax directly in templates, making it easier for developers familiar with PHP to work with it. On the other hand, Twig uses its own syntax, which is more strict and organized, making it easier to read and write complex templates.

  2. Security Features: Twig offers more security features compared to Fat-Free. Twig automatically escapes output by default, preventing common security vulnerabilities like XSS attacks. Fat-Free, on the other hand, requires developers to manually escape output, which can lead to security risks if not done properly.

  3. Extensibility: Twig is more extensible than Fat-Free. Twig comes with a wide range of built-in filters, functions, and extensions that can be easily added to templates. Fat-Free, while being lightweight, lacks the variety of built-in features that Twig offers, requiring developers to write more custom code for complex tasks.

  4. Cache Management: Fat-Free provides better cache management compared to Twig. Fat-Free has built-in support for caching, allowing developers to cache entire templates or specific blocks of code easily. Twig, while supporting caching, requires more manual configuration and setup to achieve the same level of efficiency as Fat-Free.

  5. Ease of Learning: Fat-Free is easier to learn for developers who are already familiar with PHP. Since Fat-Free uses PHP syntax directly in templates, developers with a background in PHP can start working with it quickly. Twig, with its strict and organized syntax, may have a steeper learning curve for those transitioning from PHP or other templating engines.

  6. Community Support: Twig has a larger and more active community compared to Fat-Free. This means that Twig has more resources, tutorials, and support available online, making it easier for developers to troubleshoot issues and find solutions to common problems.

In Summary, Fat-Free and Twig have notable differences in syntax, security features, extensibility, cache management, ease of learning, and community support. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free
Fat-Free
Twig
Twig

Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

-
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
443
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
39
Stacks
382
Followers
51
Followers
157
Votes
41
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Open source
  • 7
    Fast
  • 5
    Neat and Clean
  • 5
    Design pattern flexibility
  • 4
    SQL AND NOSQL ORM
Pros
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, Twig?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase