StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Fedora vs FreeBSD

Fedora vs FreeBSD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Stacks250
Followers196
Votes28
Fedora
Fedora
Stacks623
Followers515
Votes97

Fedora vs FreeBSD: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Fedora and FreeBSD. Both Fedora and FreeBSD are operating systems, but they have distinct characteristics and features that set them apart. In the following sections, we will explore these differences in more detail.

  1. Filesystem: One major difference between Fedora and FreeBSD is their choice of filesystem. Fedora primarily uses the ext4 filesystem, which is a popular choice for many Linux distributions. On the other hand, FreeBSD utilizes the ZFS (Zettabyte File System), which is a highly advanced and robust filesystem offering features like data integrity, snapshotting, and easy disk management.

  2. Package Management: Another significant difference lies in their package management systems. Fedora utilizes the DNF (Dandified Yum) package manager, which replaced the older Yum package manager. DNF is known for its faster performance and better dependency resolution. FreeBSD, on the other hand, uses the Ports Collection, a comprehensive framework that allows users to install software from source code. This gives FreeBSD users more control and flexibility over their software installations.

  3. Kernel: Fedora and FreeBSD also differ in terms of their kernel. Fedora uses the Linux kernel, which is known for its wide hardware support and extensive features. On the other hand, FreeBSD has its own kernel, known as the FreeBSD kernel. The FreeBSD kernel is known for its stability, security, and scalability, especially in server environments.

  4. Licensing: Fedora and FreeBSD also have different licensing models. Fedora falls under theOpen Source Initiative-approved license, which allows users to freely modify, redistribute, and use the software. FreeBSD, on the other hand, falls under the BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution) license, which is also open-source and allows for modification, redistribution, and use, but with fewer restrictions compared to some other licenses.

  5. Community and Support: Both Fedora and FreeBSD have their own communities and support systems. Fedora has a large community of developers and users, which results in regular updates, support forums, and extensive documentation. FreeBSD also has an active community, with resources like mailing lists, forums, and an extensive handbook. While both communities are active and supportive, Fedora's community tends to be larger and more diverse due to its popularity as a Linux distribution.

  6. Focus and Target Audience: Lastly, Fedora and FreeBSD have different focus areas and target audiences. Fedora is generally more focused on providing the latest software and technologies, making it suitable for desktop users, developers, and Linux enthusiasts who value cutting-edge features. FreeBSD, on the other hand, is known for its stability, security, and reliability, making it a popular choice for server environments and enterprise applications where stability is crucial.

In summary, Fedora and FreeBSD differ in their choice of filesystems, package management systems, kernels, licensing models, community support, and target audiences. While Fedora focuses on providing the latest technologies and is popular among desktop users and developers, FreeBSD prioritizes stability and security, making it more prevalent in server environments and enterprise applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Fedora
Fedora

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

KMS And New drm2 Video Drivers; Capsicum Enabled By Default; New Binary Packaging System; Unmapped I/O
-
Statistics
Stacks
250
Stacks
623
Followers
196
Followers
515
Votes
28
Votes
97
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Excellent as Server
  • 6
    Very Stable
  • 4
    Helpful community
  • 2
    Ports and packages system is mature and well-supported
  • 2
    Good for Cloud - Nextcloud
Cons
  • 1
    Poor support for laptops, especially wireless cards
  • 1
    Slower to adopt non-server hardware than Linux
Pros
  • 23
    Great for developers
  • 10
    Good release schedule
  • 10
    Represents the future of rhel/centos
  • 10
    Great integration with system tools
  • 8
    Reliable
Cons
  • 3
    Bugs get fixed slowly from kernel side
  • 2
    Much less support from Wiki
  • 2
    Boring
  • 2
    Systemd
  • 1
    A bit complicated

What are some alternatives to FreeBSD, Fedora?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase