StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Felgo vs Qt

Felgo vs Qt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
Felgo
Felgo
Stacks10
Followers51
Votes3

Felgo vs Qt: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Felgo and Qt are both popular frameworks for developing cross-platform applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Felgo and Qt.

1. Scalability: Felgo is specifically designed for mobile and desktop application development, providing a wide range of pre-built components and templates tailored for these platforms. On the other hand, Qt is a comprehensive framework that can be used for building applications across various domains, including embedded systems, automotive, and more. It offers a larger set of libraries and tools, making it suitable for more complex projects.

2. Licensing: Felgo offers a commercial license model, providing dedicated support and additional features for enterprise customers. Qt, on the other hand, offers both a commercial license and an open-source license, allowing developers to choose the option that best fits their needs and budget.

3. UI Design: Felgo provides a set of ready-to-use UI controls, which are optimized for mobile and desktop platforms. It offers a visually appealing and modern user interface design, with built-in themes and styling options. Qt, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in UI design, allowing developers to create highly customizable and scalable user interfaces.

4. Development Workflow: Felgo focuses on simplifying the development process by providing an integrated development environment (IDE) that bundles essential tools like a code editor, deployment assistant, and graphical user interface (GUI) designer. Qt, on the other hand, offers a modular approach, where developers can choose the tools and components they need, resulting in a more tailored and lightweight development workflow.

5. Platform Support: Felgo primarily targets the iOS, Android, and desktop platforms, providing native app performance and integration with device-specific features. Qt, on the other hand, supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, embedded systems, and more. It allows developers to build applications that can run across different operating systems and devices.

6. Community and Support: Both Felgo and Qt have active communities and offer support to developers. However, Qt has a larger user base and a more established presence in the software development industry. This means that developers using Qt may find more resources, tutorials, and community-driven support options.

In summary, Felgo is a specialized framework for mobile and desktop application development with a focus on simplicity and visual appeal, while Qt is a comprehensive framework that offers scalability, flexibility, and platform diversity for a wide range of applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
Felgo
Felgo

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

It is a cross-platform development tool, based on the Qt framework. It can be used to create mobile apps or games. Felgo apps and games are supported on iOS, Android, Windows Phone, embedded devices and desktop devices

-
Access Controls/Permissions; Code Refactoring; Collaboration Tools; Compatibility Testing; Data Modeling; Debugging; Deployment Management; Mobile Development; Reporting/Analytics; Software Development; Source Control
Statistics
Stacks
464
Stacks
10
Followers
637
Followers
51
Votes
138
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Performance
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
Pros
  • 1
    Easy UIs and animations
  • 1
    Native cross-platform apps
  • 1
    Easy to learn with a lot of tutorials
Integrations
No integrations available
Algolia
Algolia
Buddy
Buddy
Bitrise
Bitrise
Deco
Deco
Unity
Unity
Android Studio
Android Studio
NativeBase
NativeBase

What are some alternatives to Qt, Felgo?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Vue Native

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase