Finatra vs Twig

Overview

Twig

Stacks381

Followers157

Votes8

Finatra

Stacks36

Followers52

Votes13

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks404

Finatra vs Twig: What are the differences?

What is Finatra? Fast, testable, Scala services built on TwitterServer and Finagle, by Twitter. At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.

What is Twig? A flexible, fast, and secure template engine. It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Finatra can be classified as a tool in the "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category, while Twig is grouped under "Templating Languages & Extensions".

Finatra is an open source tool with 1.93K GitHub stars and 355 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Finatra's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Twig	Finatra
It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.	At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented	Production use as Twitter’s HTTP framework;~50 times faster than v1.6 in several benchmarks;Powerful feature and integration test support;Optional JSR-330 Dependency Injection using Google Guice;Jackson based JSON parsing supporting required fields, default values, and custom validations;Logback MDC integration with com.twitter.util.Local for contextual logging across futures
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 404
Stacks 381	Stacks 36
Followers 157	Followers 52
Votes 8	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Native html, xml, txt etc 2 Gulp 2 Front to back with no efforts 2 For both nodejs and php	Pros 7 Fast 6 Easy
Integrations
PHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Twig, Finatra?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.