StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs JSON Web Token

Firebase Authentication vs JSON Web Token

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55

Firebase Authentication vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

Firebase Authentication and JSON Web Token (JWT) are both authentication systems used for securing websites and applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.
  1. Scalability and Infrastructure: Firebase Authentication is a ready-to-use service provided by Google that handles all aspects of user authentication, including user management, password recovery, and authentication flows. On the other hand, JSON Web Tokens are stateless and require implementation and infrastructure from the developer's end to handle authentication.

  2. Flexibility in Authentication Providers: Firebase Authentication provides built-in support for popular authentication providers like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and more. This allows developers to easily integrate multiple authentication options into their applications. In contrast, JSON Web Tokens can be used with any authentication provider, as long as the server can validate the tokens.

  3. Token Expiration and Revocation: Firebase Authentication provides built-in token expiration and revocation, ensuring security and control over access tokens. In contrast, JSON Web Tokens need to be manually configured for expiration and revocation, which requires additional infrastructure and implementation effort.

  4. Authenticating Backend Services: Firebase Authentication provides backend SDKs that allow easy integration and authentication of backend services with minimal setup. JSON Web Tokens also allow authentication of backend services but require the developer to implement the necessary logic for validating and verifying the tokens.

  5. Storing User Data: Firebase Authentication provides a user management system that securely stores user data, including profile information, user IDs, and authentication details. JSON Web Tokens do not inherently include a user management system and require additional implementation for storing and managing user data.

  6. Powerful Authentication Flows: Firebase Authentication provides out-of-the-box support for authentication flows like email verification, password reset, multi-factor authentication, and social login. JSON Web Tokens do not offer these functionalities natively and require additional implementation and infrastructure to handle these authentication flows.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication offers a ready-to-use authentication system with built-in support for multiple providers and powerful authentication flows, while JSON Web Tokens provide flexibility but require more manual implementation and infrastructure to handle authentication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

compact;self-contained
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
374
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
533
Followers
367
Followers
610
Votes
0
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack

What are some alternatives to JSON Web Token, Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope