StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs LDAP

Firebase Authentication vs LDAP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55
LDAP
LDAP
Stacks76
Followers70
Votes0

Firebase Authentication vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Firebase Authentication vs LDAP

1. Integration and Deployment: Firebase Authentication is a cloud-based authentication service that allows easy integration and deployment with web and mobile applications. On the other hand, LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) is a protocol that provides access to directory services, requiring a dedicated LDAP server to be installed and configured.

2. User Management: Firebase Authentication provides a comprehensive user management system out of the box, including user registration, login, password reset, and email verification. In contrast, LDAP requires manual configuration and development for user management features.

3. Third-party Authentication: Firebase Authentication offers built-in support for popular third-party identity providers such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, making it easier to implement multi-platform authentication. LDAP, on the other hand, does not have native support for third-party authentication and requires additional development.

4. Scalability and Performance: Firebase Authentication leverages the power of Google's infrastructure to offer a highly scalable and performant authentication service that can handle a large number of concurrent users. LDAP performance and scalability depend on the configuration and hardware resources available for the LDAP server.

5. Security: Firebase Authentication provides secure authentication using industry-standard protocols and encryption. It also offers features like two-factor authentication and secure token generation. LDAP can also provide secure authentication, but the security depends on the implementation and configuration of the LDAP server.

6. Ease of Use: Firebase Authentication provides a simple and intuitive API, SDKs, and libraries for different programming languages, making it easy to implement authentication features in web and mobile applications. LDAP, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of the protocol and its implementation, which may require more development effort.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication offers easy integration, comprehensive user management, support for third-party authentication, scalability, security, and ease of use compared to LDAP, which requires manual configuration, lacks built-in third-party authentication support, and may have scalability and performance limitations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
LDAP
LDAP

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

-
Lightweight directory access protocol; Used for authentication and storing information; General-purpose data store
Statistics
Stacks
533
Stacks
76
Followers
610
Followers
70
Votes
55
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Firebase Authentication, LDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope