StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs OAuth2

Firebase Authentication vs OAuth2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55

Firebase Authentication vs OAuth2: What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Authentication and OAuth2 are both authentication frameworks used to authenticate users on websites and applications. While they have similar functionalities, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Security Model: Firebase Authentication is a user authentication and management service provided by Firebase, while OAuth2 is an authorization framework. Firebase Authentication provides user authentication and token-based security, while OAuth2 focuses on authorization of third-party applications to access user resources.

  2. Integration Complexity: Firebase Authentication provides a simple and seamless integration process, with easy-to-use SDKs and a comprehensive set of APIs. In contrast, integrating OAuth2 requires additional development effort, as it involves interacting with multiple components, such as authorization servers and resource servers.

  3. User Data Management: Firebase Authentication offers built-in user data management functionalities like user profile creation, email verification, and password reset. OAuth2 does not provide built-in user data management and relies on the resource server to authenticate and authorize user access.

  4. Supported Identity Providers: Firebase Authentication offers support for multiple identity providers like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and others, allowing users to choose how they want to authenticate. OAuth2, on the other hand, relies on external identity providers, which can vary depending on the implementation and the chosen authentication flow.

  5. Scopes and Granularity: OAuth2 provides fine-grained control over access using scopes, allowing users to grant limited permissions to third-party applications. Firebase Authentication does not have the same level of granularity and primarily focuses on user authentication and authorization for the Firebase services.

  6. Data Ownership: Firebase Authentication stores user data within the Firebase ecosystem, giving developers control and ownership over the user data. In OAuth2, the resource owner, which is often the user, retains ownership of the data, and third-party applications gain temporary access with the user's consent.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication focuses on user authentication and data management with a simpler integration process, while OAuth2 is a more flexible authorization framework with more granular control over the access permissions of third-party applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OAuth2
OAuth2
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Statistics
Stacks
683
Stacks
533
Followers
650
Followers
610
Votes
0
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack

What are some alternatives to OAuth2, Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope