StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Fluxible vs GreenSock

Fluxible vs GreenSock

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GreenSock
GreenSock
Stacks82
Followers117
Votes0
Fluxible
Fluxible
Stacks12
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks224

Fluxible vs GreenSock: What are the differences?

Introduction: Fluxible and GreenSock are both popular libraries used for front-end development. While they may have some similarities, they also have key differences that developers should be aware of.

1. Scalability: Fluxible is designed to handle large-scale applications with complex data flow, making it ideal for enterprise-level projects that require robust state management. On the other hand, GreenSock is primarily used for animations and effects, making it more suitable for smaller, more focused projects that require intricate animations.

2. Focus: Fluxible is focused on maintaining a unidirectional data flow, ensuring predictable and traceable data changes throughout the application. Meanwhile, GreenSock prioritizes providing a powerful animation platform, allowing developers to create stunning visual effects and user interactions.

3. Learning Curve: Fluxible, being based on the Flux architecture, may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to the concept of unidirectional data flows and stores. In contrast, GreenSock's API is relatively easier to grasp, especially for those with experience in creating animations and timelines.

4. Community Support: Fluxible has a strong community of developers and contributors who actively maintain and improve the library, offering a wealth of resources and support for users. While GreenSock also has a dedicated community, its focus on animations may mean slightly fewer resources dedicated to general front-end development queries.

5. Use Cases: Fluxible is best suited for applications that require extensive data management, such as e-commerce platforms or content-heavy websites that rely on real-time updates. GreenSock, on the other hand, shines when used for creating engaging and interactive user interfaces, making it perfect for portfolios, creative websites, and web-based games.

6. Compatibility: Fluxible is designed to work seamlessly with React, providing a powerful combination for developing dynamic and data-driven applications. GreenSock, while compatible with various frameworks and libraries, is particularly popular among designers and developers working on simple to complex animation projects in web development.

In Summary, Fluxible and GreenSock offer distinct advantages in different areas of front-end development, with Fluxible excelling in state management and data flow, while GreenSock shines in creating captivating animations and effects for web interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GreenSock
GreenSock
Fluxible
Fluxible

It is a JavaScript library for creating high-performance animations that work in every major browser. It delivers advanced sequencing, reliability, API efficiency, and tight control while solving real-world problems. It works around countless browser inconsistencies.

Pluggable, singleton-free container for isomorphic Flux applications.

-
Singleton-free for server rendering;Store dehydration for client bootstrapping;Stateless async actions;Higher order components for easy integration;Enforcement of Flux flow - restricted access to the Flux interface from within components;Pluggable - add your own interfaces to the Flux context;Updated for React 0.13
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
224
Stacks
82
Stacks
12
Followers
117
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to GreenSock, Fluxible?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase