Fluxxor vs Materialize

Overview

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Fluxxor

Stacks7

Followers16

Votes0

Fluxxor vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fluxxor as "Set of tools to aid in developing React applications with the Flux architecture". Fluxxor is a set of tools to facilitate building JavaScript data layers using the Flux architecture by reifying many of the core Flux concepts. It works particularly well in conjunction with React as the view layer, and contains a few helpers to make integration with React applications easier. On the other hand, Materialize is detailed as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design.

Fluxxor and Materialize can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Materialize is an open source tool with 36.1K GitHub stars and 4.8K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Materialize's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Materialize	Fluxxor
A CSS Framework based on material design.	Fluxxor is a set of tools to facilitate building JavaScript data layers using the Flux architecture by reifying many of the core Flux concepts. It works particularly well in conjunction with React as the view layer, and contains a few helpers to make integration with React applications easier.
Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 39.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 698	Stacks 7
Followers 1.2K	Followers 16
Votes 557	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 102 Google material design 74 Responsive 74 Easy to use 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Flux React

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Fluxxor?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.