Fork vs SourceTree

Overview

SourceTree

Stacks10.6K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

Fork

Stacks197

Followers258

Votes126

Fork vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Fork and SourceTree are both popular tools used in software development for managing repositories. However, there are some key differences between the two.

Collaboration: Fork enables developers to create a copy of a repository and work on it independently, while SourceTree allows developers to collaborate by providing features like push, pull, and branch management, making it easier to work as a team.
Platform Compatibility: Fork is available on both Windows and macOS, providing a flexible option for developers. On the other hand, SourceTree is primarily designed for macOS, and the Windows version may not have all the features available on the macOS version.
User Interface: Fork offers a visually pleasing and intuitive user interface, making it easy for developers to navigate and perform tasks. SourceTree, on the other hand, has a more complex user interface with a wide range of features, which might be overwhelming for beginners.
Integration with Hosting Services: Fork provides seamless integration with popular hosting services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing developers to easily clone, commit, and push changes to remote repositories. SourceTree also integrates with these hosting services but may require additional configuration for smooth synchronization.
Advanced Features: SourceTree offers advanced features such as interactive rebasing, cherry-picking, and stashing, which allow developers to have more control over their version control workflow. Fork, on the other hand, focuses on providing a simple and streamlined experience for developers, keeping the feature set minimalistic.
Command Line Interface: While both Fork and SourceTree have graphical user interfaces, SourceTree also allows developers to use the command line interface for executing Git commands directly. This feature can be helpful for more experienced developers who prefer the command line over the graphical interface.

In summary, Fork prioritizes beginner-friendly collaboration and seamless hosting integration, while SourceTree excels in advanced features and platform flexibility. Choose Fork for a simple, intuitive workflow and easy collaboration, or SourceTree for granular control and powerful command-line capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SourceTree, Fork

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree	Fork
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.	Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.	-
Statistics
Stacks 10.6K	Stacks 197
Followers 8.1K	Followers 258
Votes 727	Votes 126
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 No dark theme (Windows) 5 Extremely slow	Pros 19 One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs 14 Nice UX 13 Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast 13 Does the job way better than others 11 Dark theme Cons 2 Poorly written license 1 Merges that require interactive user decision 1 Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
GitHub Git Bitbucket Windows macOS Mercurial	Git

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, Fork?

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana