Phalcon vs FullStack Boilerplate | What are the differences? | StackShare

FullStack Boilerplate vs Phalcon

Overview

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

FullStack Boilerplate

Stacks7

Followers30

Votes0

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

FullStack Boilerplate vs Phalcon: What are the differences?

What is FullStack Boilerplate? React Native Web with TypeScript, Node.js & GraphQL. The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.

What is Phalcon? Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP. Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.

FullStack Boilerplate and Phalcon belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

FullStack Boilerplate and Phalcon are both open source tools. It seems that FullStack Boilerplate with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.83K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Phalcon with 9.73K GitHub stars and 1.78K GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon	FullStack Boilerplate
Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.	The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.8K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 246	Stacks 7
Followers 294	Followers 30
Votes 354	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	TypeScript Apollo React Native GraphQL Node.js MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.