GoInstant vs Kinto

Overview

GoInstant

Stacks0

Followers3

Votes14

Kinto

Stacks5

Followers51

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks422

GoInstant vs Kinto: What are the differences?

Introduction

GoInstant and Kinto are both platforms that offer real-time collaboration and data synchronization capabilities. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

Operational Concept: GoInstant focuses on providing a real-time platform for building collaborative applications, emphasizing its fast synchronization and data sharing capabilities. On the other hand, Kinto is more focused on offering a simple and flexible open-source backend service for web and mobile apps, with a strong emphasis on data security and ease of integration.
Pricing Model: GoInstant has a usage-based pricing model, where customers pay according to the specific features and resources they use. In contrast, Kinto is completely open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for developers and organizations looking to minimize expenses.
Data Storage: GoInstant utilizes a document-oriented database for storing data, which can be advantageous for applications requiring complex hierarchical structures. Meanwhile, Kinto uses a key-value store for data storage, offering simplicity and efficiency for applications with straightforward data requirements.
Scalability: GoInstant is designed to handle large-scale real-time collaborations, making it suitable for applications with high traffic and user interactions. Conversely, Kinto is better suited for smaller-scale projects or applications that do not require extensive real-time capabilities, focusing more on simplicity and ease of use.
Community Support: Kinto benefits from a robust open-source community that actively contributes to its development and provides support for users. GoInstant, on the other hand, has a more limited community support system, which can be a consideration for developers seeking assistance and resources during implementation and troubleshooting.
Integration Capabilities: While both platforms offer APIs for integration with various languages and frameworks, Kinto has a more extensive range of plugins and extensions that facilitate seamless integration with different systems and services, enhancing its flexibility and adaptability for diverse application requirements.

In Summary, GoInstant and Kinto differ in their operational concepts, pricing models, data storage mechanisms, scalability, community support, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GoInstant	Kinto
It is a service for building web and mobile realtime apps easily. Simply add its library to your application to gain access to shared data storage, pub/sub messaging and more.	Kinto is a lightweight JSON storage service with synchronisation and sharing abilities.
Shared data storage; Pub/sub messaging; REST API; Client-side widgets; Angular integration (GoAngular)	Syncs user data between devices; Real time data streaming
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 422
Stacks 0	Stacks 5
Followers 3	Followers 51
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to integrate 4 Client side only applications without server hassle 2 Great documentation 1 Great AngularJS adapter 1 Great support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Postman GitHub Rekognition API	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GoInstant, Kinto?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

GoInstant vs Kinto: What are the differences?

Introduction

GoInstant and Kinto are both platforms that offer real-time collaboration and data synchronization capabilities. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

Operational Concept: GoInstant focuses on providing a real-time platform for building collaborative applications, emphasizing its fast synchronization and data sharing capabilities. On the other hand, Kinto is more focused on offering a simple and flexible open-source backend service for web and mobile apps, with a strong emphasis on data security and ease of integration.
Pricing Model: GoInstant has a usage-based pricing model, where customers pay according to the specific features and resources they use. In contrast, Kinto is completely open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for developers and organizations looking to minimize expenses.
Data Storage: GoInstant utilizes a document-oriented database for storing data, which can be advantageous for applications requiring complex hierarchical structures. Meanwhile, Kinto uses a key-value store for data storage, offering simplicity and efficiency for applications with straightforward data requirements.
Scalability: GoInstant is designed to handle large-scale real-time collaborations, making it suitable for applications with high traffic and user interactions. Conversely, Kinto is better suited for smaller-scale projects or applications that do not require extensive real-time capabilities, focusing more on simplicity and ease of use.
Community Support: Kinto benefits from a robust open-source community that actively contributes to its development and provides support for users. GoInstant, on the other hand, has a more limited community support system, which can be a consideration for developers seeking assistance and resources during implementation and troubleshooting.
Integration Capabilities: While both platforms offer APIs for integration with various languages and frameworks, Kinto has a more extensive range of plugins and extensions that facilitate seamless integration with different systems and services, enhancing its flexibility and adaptability for diverse application requirements.

In Summary, GoInstant and Kinto differ in their operational concepts, pricing models, data storage mechanisms, scalability, community support, and integration capabilities.