Alternatives to Google Cloud CDN logo

Alternatives to Google Cloud CDN

Akamai, CloudFlare, Fastly, Amazon CloudFront, and Google Cloud Storage are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Google Cloud CDN.
82
234
+ 1
3

What is Google Cloud CDN and what are its top alternatives?

Google Cloud CDN leverages Google's globally distributed edge caches to accelerate content delivery for websites and applications served out of Google Compute Engine. Cloud CDN lowers network latency, offloads origins, and reduces serving costs. Once you've set up HTTP(S) Load Balancing, simply enable Cloud CDN with a single checkbox.
Google Cloud CDN is a tool in the Content Delivery Network category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Google Cloud CDN

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Fastly
    Fastly

    Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Google Cloud Storage
    Google Cloud Storage

    Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

Google Cloud CDN alternatives & related posts

Akamai logo

Akamai

1.9K
0
The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
1.9K
0
PROS OF AKAMAI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Akamai posts

      CloudFlare logo

      CloudFlare

      76.7K
      1.8K
      The Web Performance & Security Company.
      76.7K
      1.8K
      PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 424
        Easy setup, great cdn
      • 277
        Free ssl
      • 199
        Easy setup
      • 190
        Security
      • 180
        Ssl
      • 98
        Great cdn
      • 77
        Optimizer
      • 71
        Simple
      • 44
        Great UI
      • 28
        Great js cdn
      • 12
        Apps
      • 12
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 12
        DNS Analytics
      • 12
        AutoMinify
      • 9
        Rocket Loader
      • 9
        Ipv6
      • 9
        Easy
      • 8
        IPv6 "One Click"
      • 8
        Fantastic CDN service
      • 7
        DNSSEC
      • 7
        Nice DNS
      • 7
        SSHFP
      • 7
        Free GeoIP
      • 7
        Amazing performance
      • 7
        API
      • 7
        Cheapest SSL
      • 6
        SPDY
      • 6
        Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
      • 5
        Ubuntu
      • 5
        Asynchronous resource loading
      • 4
        Global Load Balancing
      • 4
        Performance
      • 4
        Easy Use
      • 3
        CDN
      • 2
        Registrar
      • 2
        Support for SSHFP records
      • 1
        Web3
      • 1
        Прохси
      • 1
        HTTPS3/Quic
      CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 2
        No support for SSHFP records
      • 2
        Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

      related CloudFlare posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Johnny Bell

      When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

      One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

      Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

      When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

      I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

      See more
      Fastly logo

      Fastly

      1.1K
      153
      We're redefining content delivery.
      1.1K
      153
      PROS OF FASTLY
      • 28
        Real-time updates
      • 26
        Fastest CDN
      • 22
        Powerful API
      • 20
        Great support
      • 14
        Great customer support
      • 7
        Instant Purging
      • 7
        Custom VCL
      • 6
        Good pricing
      • 6
        Tag-based Purging
      • 5
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 4
        Speed & functionality
      • 4
        Image processing on demande (Fastly IO)
      • 4
        Best CDN
      CONS OF FASTLY
      • 1
        Minimum $50/mo spend

      related Fastly posts

      Justin Dorfman
      Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 245.9K views

      When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

      What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

      For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

      • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
      • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
      • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

      Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

      See more
      Amazon CloudFront logo

      Amazon CloudFront

      21.3K
      935
      Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
      21.3K
      935
      PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 245
        Fast
      • 166
        Cdn
      • 157
        Compatible with other aws services
      • 125
        Simple
      • 108
        Global
      • 41
        Cheap
      • 36
        Cost-effective
      • 27
        Reliable
      • 19
        One stop solution
      • 9
        Elastic
      • 1
        Object store
      • 1
        HTTP/2 Support
      CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 3
        UI could use some work
      • 1
        Invalidations take so long

      related Amazon CloudFront posts

      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more
      Julien DeFrance
      Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

      Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

      I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

      For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

      Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

      Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

      Future improvements / technology decisions included:

      Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

      As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

      One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

      See more
      Google Cloud Storage logo

      Google Cloud Storage

      1.7K
      75
      Durable and highly available object storage service
      1.7K
      75
      PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
      • 28
        Scalable
      • 19
        Cheap
      • 14
        Reliable
      • 9
        Easy
      • 3
        Chealp
      • 2
        More praticlal and easy
      CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Google Cloud Storage posts

        Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

        Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

        Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

        Check out the GitHub repo attached

        See more
        Aliadoc Team

        In #Aliadoc, we're exploring the crowdfunding option to get traction before launch. We are building a SaaS platform for website design customization.

        For the Admin UI and website editor we use React and we're currently transitioning from a Create React App setup to a custom one because our needs have become more specific. We use CloudFlare as much as possible, it's a great service.

        For routing dynamic resources and proxy tasks to feed websites to the editor we leverage CloudFlare Workers for improved responsiveness. We use Firebase for our hosting needs and user authentication while also using several Cloud Functions for Firebase to interact with other services along with Google App Engine and Google Cloud Storage, but also the Real Time Database is on the radar for collaborative website editing.

        We generally hate configuration but honestly because of the stage of our project we lack resources for doing heavy sysops work. So we are basically just relying on Serverless technologies as much as we can to do all server side processing.

        Visual Studio Code definitively makes programming a much easier and enjoyable task, we just love it. We combine it with Bitbucket for our source code control needs.

        See more
        Google Drive logo

        Google Drive

        82.2K
        2.1K
        A safe place for all your files
        82.2K
        2.1K
        PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 505
          Easy to use
        • 326
          Gmail integration
        • 312
          Enough free space
        • 268
          Collaboration
        • 249
          Stable service
        • 128
          Desktop and mobile apps
        • 97
          Offline sync
        • 79
          Apps
        • 74
          15 gb storage
        • 50
          Add-ons
        • 9
          Integrates well
        • 6
          Easy to use
        • 3
          Simple back-up tool
        • 2
          Amazing
        • 2
          Beautiful
        • 2
          Fast upload speeds
        • 2
          The more the merrier
        • 2
          So easy
        • 2
          Wonderful
        • 2
          Linux terminal transfer tools
        • 2
          It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
        • 1
          UI
        • 1
          Windows desktop
        • 1
          G Suite integration
        CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 7
          Organization via web ui sucks
        • 2
          Not a real database

        related Google Drive posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        Dropbox logo

        Dropbox

        23.3K
        1.7K
        Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
        23.3K
        1.7K
        PROS OF DROPBOX
        • 434
          Easy to work with
        • 256
          Free
        • 216
          Popular
        • 176
          Shared file hosting
        • 167
          'just works'
        • 100
          No brainer
        • 79
          Integration with external services
        • 76
          Simple
        • 49
          Good api
        • 38
          Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
        • 11
          It just works
        • 8
          Convenient
        • 7
          Accessible from all of my devices
        • 5
          Command Line client
        • 4
          Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
        • 4
          Can even be used by your grandma
        • 3
          Reliable
        • 3
          Sync API
        • 3
          Mac app
        • 3
          Cross platform app
        • 2
          Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
        • 2
          Delta synchronization
        • 2
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
        • 2
          Backups, local and cloud
        • 2
          Extended version history
        • 2
          Beautiful UI
        • 1
          YC Company
        • 1
          What a beautiful app
        • 1
          Easy/no setup
        • 1
          So easy
        • 1
          The more the merrier
        • 1
          Easy to work with
        • 1
          For when client needs file without opening firewall
        • 1
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Official Linux app
        • 0
          The more the merrier
        CONS OF DROPBOX
        • 3
          Personal vs company account is confusing
        • 1
          Replication kills CPU and battery

        related Dropbox posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

        Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

        See more
        MaxCDN logo

        MaxCDN

        1.6K
        100
        Our CDN makes your site load faster!
        1.6K
        100
        PROS OF MAXCDN
        • 47
          Easy setup
        • 33
          Speed to my clients
        • 15
          Great service & Customer Support
        • 5
          Shared and Affordable SSL
        CONS OF MAXCDN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MaxCDN posts

          Justin Dorfman
          Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 245.9K views

          When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

          What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

          For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

          • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
          • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
          • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

          Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

          See more
          Todd Gardner

          We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

          The reports and controls were also considerably better.

          See more