StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Google Cloud Source Repositories vs JFrog Artifactory

Google Cloud Source Repositories vs JFrog Artifactory

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Stacks91
Followers160
Votes0
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Stacks342
Followers374
Votes0

Google Cloud Source Repositories vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud Source Repositories and JFrog Artifactory are both cloud-based repository management tools that offer version control and artifact management capabilities. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with Google Cloud Platform (GCP): Google Cloud Source Repositories is tightly integrated with GCP, providing seamless integration and access to other GCP services such as App Engine, Cloud Functions, and Cloud Build. JFrog Artifactory, on the other hand, is platform agnostic and can be used with various cloud providers or on-premises environments.

  2. Version Control System Support: Google Cloud Source Repositories natively supports Git, allowing developers to easily manage and collaborate on their code repositories. In contrast, JFrog Artifactory supports multiple version control systems such as Git, Subversion, and Perforce, providing more flexibility for organizations with diverse source code management requirements.

  3. Artifact Management: JFrog Artifactory primarily focuses on artifact management, providing advanced features for storing, managing, and distributing software artifacts, including packages, libraries, and container images. While Google Cloud Source Repositories does provide some artifact storage capabilities, it is more oriented towards code version control and collaboration.

  4. Enterprise Features: JFrog Artifactory offers a wide range of enterprise-level features including access control, permission management, and fine-grained audit logs, making it suitable for large organizations with complex requirements. Google Cloud Source Repositories, although offering some level of access control, may not provide the same level of granularity and advanced enterprise features.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: JFrog Artifactory has a strong community and ecosystem, with a large user base and extensive integration capabilities with popular build tools, CI/CD pipelines, and repository managers. Google Cloud Source Repositories, while part of the larger Google Cloud ecosystem, may have a smaller community and limited integration options with non-GCP tools and services.

  6. Pricing Model: The pricing model for Google Cloud Source Repositories is based on storage and data transfer, typically charged on a per-usage basis. JFrog Artifactory offers both open-source and commercial licenses, with the pricing based on the edition and number of users, providing more flexibility and options for organizations with different budget requirements.

In Summary, Google Cloud Source Repositories is tightly integrated with GCP, primarily focused on Git version control, and provides some artifact storage capabilities, while JFrog Artifactory is platform agnostic, offers support for multiple version control systems, and focuses on advanced artifact management features with a stronger community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Source Repositories, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet
tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaGitHubGitHubJFrog ArtifactoryJFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory

Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
-
Statistics
Stacks
91
Stacks
342
Followers
160
Followers
374
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Debian
Debian
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Source Repositories, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana