StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Google Cloud Spanner vs Hadoop

Google Cloud Spanner vs Hadoop

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks1.1K

Google Cloud Spanner vs Hadoop: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud Spanner and Hadoop are two popular technologies used for handling big data processing, but they have key differences in terms of data model, scalability, query flexibility, data storage, data consistency, and ecosystem maturity.

  1. Data Model: Google Cloud Spanner is a horizontally scalable, globally distributed relational database while Hadoop is a framework for distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers. Spanner provides ACID transactions and enforces relational schema, whereas Hadoop does not enforce a schema and is more suitable for unstructured or semi-structured data.

  2. Scalability: Spanner is designed for horizontal scalability and can handle large workloads with ease. It automatically splits and distributes data across multiple servers for high availability and performance. Hadoop also scales horizontally by adding more servers to the cluster, but it requires manual configuration and optimization to achieve optimal scalability.

  3. Query Flexibility: Spanner supports SQL for querying data, which makes it easy to use for developers familiar with relational databases. Hadoop, on the other hand, supports various query languages like HiveQL, Pig Latin, and Spark SQL, which provide more flexibility for different use cases and data processing needs.

  4. Data Storage: Spanner uses a distributed storage system called Colossus for storing its data, providing high durability and availability. Hadoop, on the other hand, can use various storage systems like Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), Amazon S3, or Azure Blob Storage, which provides flexibility in choosing the storage solution based on the requirements.

  5. Data Consistency: Spanner guarantees strong consistency across all replicas, even in the presence of network partitions or failures. Hadoop's consistency model depends on the underlying storage system used, and it may trade off consistency for scalability or fault tolerance.

  6. Ecosystem Maturity: Spanner is a fully managed service provided by Google, which means it has a mature ecosystem with support for various tools and integrations. Hadoop, being an open-source framework, also has a rich ecosystem with a wide range of tools and libraries, but it requires more effort and expertise to set up and manage.

In summary, Google Cloud Spanner is a globally distributed, highly scalable relational database with ACID transactions and strong consistency, while Hadoop is a framework for distributed processing of large datasets with a flexible data model and a rich ecosystem of tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It is a globally distributed database service that gives developers a production-ready storage solution. It provides key features such as global transactions, strongly consistent reads, and automatic multi-site replication and failover.

-
Global transactions; Strongly consistent reads; Automatic multi-site replication; Failover.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
57
Followers
2.3K
Followers
117
Votes
56
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Amazon aws
  • 1
    Java syntax
Pros
  • 1
    Horizontal scaling
  • 1
    Strongly consistent
  • 1
    Scalable
Integrations
No integrations available
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Google Cloud Spanner?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase