Google Test vs Mockito

Overview

Mockito

Stacks3.6K

Followers180

Votes0

GitHub Stars15.3K

Forks2.6K

Google Test

Stacks16

Followers31

Votes0

GitHub Stars37.4K

Forks10.6K

Google Test vs Mockito: What are the differences?

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Google Test and Mockito. Both Google Test and Mockito are popular testing frameworks used for different purposes in software development.

Design Philosophy: Google Test is primarily designed for C++ applications, focusing on test-driven development and helping developers write robust and efficient unit tests. On the other hand, Mockito is a mocking framework used primarily in Java applications for creating test doubles and mocking dependencies in order to facilitate isolated and focused unit testing.
Mocks vs Stubs: While both Google Test and Mockito provide capabilities for creating test doubles, the main difference lies in their approach. Mockito emphasizes the use of mocks, allowing developers to define behavior and verify interactions. Google Test, however, focuses on stubs, providing developers with pre-defined, configurable objects to use in their unit tests.
Programming Language Support: Google Test is primarily used for C++ applications and provides extensive support for testing C++ code. On the other hand, Mockito is specifically designed for Java applications, providing features that are tailored for testing Java code.
Integration Testing: Google Test is primarily used for unit testing, focusing on testing individual units of code in isolation. Mockito, on the other hand, is commonly used in integration testing scenarios, where it allows developers to easily mock dependencies and control their behavior during the test.
Test Coverage: Google Test is well-known for its ability to generate code coverage reports, allowing developers to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of their tests. Mockito, however, does not provide built-in support for code coverage analysis.
Community and Documentation: Google Test has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available. Mockito also has a strong community support base, with thorough documentation and numerous examples to help developers get started.

In Summary, Google Test is primarily focused on test-driven development for C++ applications, while Mockito is a mocking framework for Java applications, emphasizing behavior verification and support for integration testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito	Google Test
It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.	It is a unit testing library for the C++ programming language, based on the xUnit architecture. The library is released under the BSD 3-clause license. It can be compiled for a variety of POSIX and Windows platforms, allowing unit-testing of C sources as well as C++ with minimal source modification.
-	An xUnit test framework; Test discovery; A rich set of assertions; User-defined assertions; Death tests; Fatal and non-fatal failures; Value-parameterized tests; Type-parameterized tests; Various options for running the tests; XML test report generation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.3K	GitHub Stars 37.4K
GitHub Forks 2.6K	GitHub Forks 10.6K
Stacks 3.6K	Stacks 16
Followers 180	Followers 31
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux PlatformIO Windows C++ Mac OS X Cygwin

What are some alternatives to Mockito, Google Test?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

Google Test vs Mockito: What are the differences?

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Google Test and Mockito. Both Google Test and Mockito are popular testing frameworks used for different purposes in software development.

Design Philosophy: Google Test is primarily designed for C++ applications, focusing on test-driven development and helping developers write robust and efficient unit tests. On the other hand, Mockito is a mocking framework used primarily in Java applications for creating test doubles and mocking dependencies in order to facilitate isolated and focused unit testing.
Mocks vs Stubs: While both Google Test and Mockito provide capabilities for creating test doubles, the main difference lies in their approach. Mockito emphasizes the use of mocks, allowing developers to define behavior and verify interactions. Google Test, however, focuses on stubs, providing developers with pre-defined, configurable objects to use in their unit tests.
Programming Language Support: Google Test is primarily used for C++ applications and provides extensive support for testing C++ code. On the other hand, Mockito is specifically designed for Java applications, providing features that are tailored for testing Java code.
Integration Testing: Google Test is primarily used for unit testing, focusing on testing individual units of code in isolation. Mockito, on the other hand, is commonly used in integration testing scenarios, where it allows developers to easily mock dependencies and control their behavior during the test.
Test Coverage: Google Test is well-known for its ability to generate code coverage reports, allowing developers to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of their tests. Mockito, however, does not provide built-in support for code coverage analysis.
Community and Documentation: Google Test has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available. Mockito also has a strong community support base, with thorough documentation and numerous examples to help developers get started.

Google Test vs Mockito

Overview