What is λ Gordon and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to λ Gordon
It is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. With just one tool to download and configure, you can control multiple AWS services from the command line and automate them through scripts. ...
LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications. ...
The AWS Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. ...
The troposphere library allows for easier creation of the AWS CloudFormation JSON by writing Python code to describe the AWS resources. troposphere also includes some basic support for OpenStack resources via Heat. ...
awless is a fast, powerful and easy-to-use command line interface (CLI) to manage Amazon Web Services. ...
Blox is a collection of open source projects for container management and orchestration. Blox gives you more control over how your containerized applications run on Amazon ECS. It enables you to build schedulers and integrate third-party schedulers on top of ECS, while leveraging Amazon ECS to fully manage and scale your clusters. ...
It is an alternative to the AWS console focused on developer experience and cost transparency. It is meant to work alongside your existing automation tools. ...
λ Gordon alternatives & related posts
- Better with Relations and Security2
- Continuous deployment1
- Flexible Auth options1
- Backed by Amazon1
- Free tier is limited2
- Steep Learning Curve1
related AWS Amplify posts
I am currently working on a long term mobile app project. Current stack: Frontend: Dart/Flutter Backend: Go, AWS Resources (AWS Lambda, Amazon DynamoDB, etc.) Since there are only two developers and we have limited time and resources, we are looking for a BAAS like Firebase or AWS Amplify to handle auth and push notifications for now. We are prioritizing developing speed so we can iterate quickly. The only problem is that AWS amplify support for flutter is in developer preview and has limited capabilities (We have tested it out in our app). Firebase is the more mature option. It has great support for flutter and has more than we need for auth, notifications, etc. My question is that, if we choose firebase, we would be stuck with using two different cloud providers. Is this bad, or is this even a problem? I am willing to change anything on the backend architecture wise, so any suggestions would be greatly appreciated as I am somewhat unfamiliar with Google Cloud Platform. Thank you.
related AWS CLI posts
- Integration with Python/nosetests4
- Local/offline testing4
- No dependency on cloud4
- Available as Docker image3
- Easy to use3
- The correct URL is https://github.com/localstack/locals3
- Integration with Java/JUnit3
- Increases dev speed3
- Continuous integration3
- Cost effective testing3
- No proper admin panel/web UI1
- Doesn't work well on Windows1
related LocalStack posts
related AWS Shell posts
- Infrastructure as code0
related troposphere posts
- Easy Setup3
- Powerful commands to access any AWS service3
- An intuitive UI of output2