Gridsome vs Hugo

Overview

Hugo

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.2K

Votes206

Gridsome

Stacks160

Followers295

Votes51

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks481

Gridsome vs Hugo: What are the differences?

1. Templating Language: One key difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the templating language used. Gridsome uses Vue.js as its templating language, which provides a more dynamic and reactive approach to building websites. On the other hand, Hugo uses its own templating language called Hugo Templates, which is simple and fast.
2. Build Speed: Another significant difference is the build speed of the websites. Gridsome uses GraphQL to fetch and manage data, which allows for highly efficient data fetching and faster build times. On the contrary, Hugo is known for its incredible build speed, being one of the fastest static site generators available.
3. Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their plugin ecosystems. Gridsome has a growing and active plugin ecosystem with various plugins available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Hugo has a vast number of highly optimized and well-documented community-created themes and templates.
4. Content Sources: Gridsome and Hugo differ in the types of content sources they can integrate with. Gridsome excels in pulling data from multiple sources like Markdown files, headless CMSs, APIs, and databases using GraphQL. In contrast, Hugo primarily focuses on static content sources such as Markdown files and JSON/YAML data.
5. Asset Pipeline: Another difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the way they handle assets like images and stylesheets. Gridsome leverages the power of webpack and allows developers to import and optimize assets effortlessly. In contrast, Hugo follows a simpler approach where developers need to manually handle the assets and place them in the appropriate directories.
6. Community Support: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their community support. Gridsome has a growing community with active developers and regular updates, but it is relatively newer compared to Hugo. Hugo, on the other hand, has an extensive and mature community with a vast amount of documentation, forums, and resources available.

In Summary, Gridsome and Hugo differ in their templating language, build speed, plugin ecosystem, content sources, asset pipeline, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Hugo, Gridsome

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.5k views53.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hugo	Gridsome
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.	Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.
Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.;Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.; Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 481
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 160
Followers 1.2K	Followers 295
Votes 206	Votes 51
Pros & Cons
Pros 47 Lightning fast 29 Single Executable 26 Easy setup 24 Great development community 23 Open source Cons 4 No Plugins/Extensions 2 Template syntax not friendly 1 Quick builds	Pros 16 Vuejs 10 GraphQL 6 Starter kit as a base for new project 5 Reusable components (Vue) 4 Open source Cons 1 Still young 1 Open source
Integrations
Markdown Golang	Node.js Drupal Vue.js prismic.io WordPress Webpack GraphQL Contentful GraphCMS

What are some alternatives to Hugo, Gridsome?

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

VuePress

A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.

Related Comparisons

Gridsome vs Hugo: What are the differences?

1. Templating Language: One key difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the templating language used. Gridsome uses Vue.js as its templating language, which provides a more dynamic and reactive approach to building websites. On the other hand, Hugo uses its own templating language called Hugo Templates, which is simple and fast.
2. Build Speed: Another significant difference is the build speed of the websites. Gridsome uses GraphQL to fetch and manage data, which allows for highly efficient data fetching and faster build times. On the contrary, Hugo is known for its incredible build speed, being one of the fastest static site generators available.
3. Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their plugin ecosystems. Gridsome has a growing and active plugin ecosystem with various plugins available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Hugo has a vast number of highly optimized and well-documented community-created themes and templates.
4. Content Sources: Gridsome and Hugo differ in the types of content sources they can integrate with. Gridsome excels in pulling data from multiple sources like Markdown files, headless CMSs, APIs, and databases using GraphQL. In contrast, Hugo primarily focuses on static content sources such as Markdown files and JSON/YAML data.
5. Asset Pipeline: Another difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the way they handle assets like images and stylesheets. Gridsome leverages the power of webpack and allows developers to import and optimize assets effortlessly. In contrast, Hugo follows a simpler approach where developers need to manually handle the assets and place them in the appropriate directories.
6. Community Support: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their community support. Gridsome has a growing community with active developers and regular updates, but it is relatively newer compared to Hugo. Hugo, on the other hand, has an extensive and mature community with a vast amount of documentation, forums, and resources available.

In Summary, Gridsome and Hugo differ in their templating language, build speed, plugin ecosystem, content sources, asset pipeline, and community support.

Gridsome vs Hugo

Overview