StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Guardian vs OAuth.io

Guardian vs OAuth.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth.io
OAuth.io
Stacks21
Followers145
Votes12
Guardian
Guardian
Stacks7
Followers18
Votes0

Guardian vs OAuth.io: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication Protocol: The key difference between Guardian and OAuth.io lies in their authentication protocol. Guardian primarily uses JSON Web Token (JWT) for authentication, providing a stateless and secure way to authenticate users. On the other hand, OAuth.io focuses on standard OAuth protocols for authentication, enabling users to grant access to third-party applications without sharing their passwords.

  2. Customization and Control: Another notable difference is the level of customization and control offered by both platforms. Guardian allows developers to have more control over the authentication process by providing customizable authentication flows and options. In contrast, OAuth.io simplifies the process by handling the complexity of OAuth protocols, limiting the customization options available to developers.

  3. Supported Platforms: Guardian is primarily designed for integration with Elixir and Phoenix frameworks, offering seamless authentication solutions within these environments. In comparison, OAuth.io supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it a versatile choice for developers working across different technologies and frameworks.

  4. Ease of Implementation: When it comes to ease of implementation, Guardian is known for its simplicity and straightforward setup process, making it ideal for developers looking for a quick and efficient authentication solution. Conversely, OAuth.io may require more configuration and setup due to its support for various OAuth protocols and platforms, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for developers.

  5. Community and Support: The level of community engagement and support differs between Guardian and OAuth.io. Guardian benefits from a strong and active community of Elixir developers who contribute to its ongoing development and provide support through forums and documentation. On the other hand, OAuth.io boasts a larger user base and extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and help for troubleshooting and implementation challenges.

  6. Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability and performance, Guardian is favored for its lightweight and efficient JWT-based authentication, making it suitable for applications requiring high performance and scalability. In contrast, OAuth.io's reliance on standard OAuth protocols may introduce additional overhead, impacting the overall performance and scalability of the authentication process in certain use cases.

In Summary, Guardian and OAuth.io differ in their authentication protocols, customization levels, supported platforms, ease of implementation, community support, and scalability/performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OAuth.io
OAuth.io
Guardian
Guardian

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.

Quickly integrate API providers; More than 100 providers available; Secured encrypted API; Simplified API calls; Web and mobile SDKs; User and app activity analytics; Request API: perform actions on behalf of users
Perfect for both production and testing;Guardian is centralized and easily configurable to allow multiple environments giving you the flexibility you need
Statistics
Stacks
21
Stacks
7
Followers
145
Followers
18
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    SDK's
  • 3
    Integration with 100+ Providers
  • 1
    Useful screenshots
  • 1
    Add your own provider
  • 1
    Core oauthd open source
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to OAuth.io, Guardian?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope