StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. HarperDB vs MongoDB

HarperDB vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
HarperDB
HarperDB
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes9

HarperDB vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between HarperDB and MongoDB, two popular database management systems. Both HarperDB and MongoDB have their own advantages and use cases, and understanding their differences can help in choosing the right one for specific requirements.

  1. Data Model: HarperDB is a multi-model database that supports both SQL and NoSQL data models. It provides schema flexibility and allows users to define their own models based on their application needs. On the other hand, MongoDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database where data is stored in JSON-like documents. It follows a flexible schema-less data model, allowing for dynamic and nested data structures.

  2. Scalability: HarperDB offers horizontal scalability, allowing users to scale their databases across multiple machines in a distributed environment. This ensures high availability and performance. MongoDB also supports horizontal scalability through sharding, where data is distributed across multiple servers. However, MongoDB's sharding implementation is more complex compared to HarperDB's built-in distributed architecture.

  3. Query Language: HarperDB supports both SQL and NoSQL query languages, providing users with the flexibility to choose the most suitable approach for their requirements. It supports traditional SQL queries as well as NoSQL-style queries using JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) syntax. MongoDB uses its own query language called the MongoDB Query Language (MQL), which is designed specifically for querying JSON-like documents.

  4. Indexing: HarperDB supports both primary and secondary indexes to optimize query performance. It allows users to define indexes on any combination of fields in their data models. MongoDB also supports indexing, including primary and secondary indexes. Additionally, MongoDB provides a range of index types such as compound indexes, text indexes, and geospatial indexes, allowing for more advanced querying capabilities.

  5. Transactions: HarperDB provides full support for multi-document transactions, ensuring data consistency and integrity across multiple operations. It allows users to execute multiple queries as part of a single transaction, ensuring that all changes are either committed or rolled back together. MongoDB also supports transactions, but the support is limited to operations within a single document or multiple documents within a single replica set. Distributed transactions across multiple replica sets require additional setup and configuration.

  6. Deployment Options: HarperDB can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. It provides flexibility in choosing the deployment option based on specific requirements. MongoDB is also available for on-premises deployment as well as in the cloud. It offers managed cloud services like MongoDB Atlas, which simplifies the deployment and management of MongoDB clusters.

In summary, HarperDB is a multi-model database with support for SQL and NoSQL query languages, offering flexibility in data modeling and deployment options. It provides built-in distributed architecture for horizontal scalability and supports full multi-document transactions. MongoDB, on the other hand, is a document-oriented NoSQL database that excels in handling JSON-like documents and offers a wide range of indexing options. It supports sharding for horizontal scalability and provides limited support for transactions. The choice between HarperDB and MongoDB depends on the specific requirements of the application and the desired trade-offs between flexibility, scalability, and transactional capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, HarperDB

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
HarperDB
HarperDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Harper takes the "stack" out of "tech stack" by combining data storage, caching, application, and messaging functions into a single technology to achieve unmatched global low latency, simplicity, and cost performance at scale.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Cloud; Edge Computing; On Prem; Globally Distributed; Custom Functions; Database-as-a-service; Hybrid Cloud; Clustering and Replication; Fully-Indexed; Dynamic Schema; Small Footprint; SQL Query Engine; Full NoSQL Capabilities; Configurable Table-Level Pub/Sub; Built In API with Single End Point; Role Based Security; User Friendly Management Studio; Industry Standard Interfaces & Drivers;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
6
Followers
82.0K
Followers
18
Votes
4.1K
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 2
    Data api
  • 1
    Cost efficient
  • 1
    Flexibility
  • 1
    Edge capabilities
  • 1
    Performance
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
GraphQL
GraphQL
Docker
Docker
.NET
.NET
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
React.js Boilerplate
React.js Boilerplate
uWebSockets
uWebSockets
Python
Python
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, HarperDB?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase