StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Hound vs Stylelint

Hound vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hound
Hound
Stacks41
Followers47
Votes14
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

Hound vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

  1. File Types: Hound is specifically designed to analyze Ruby code, while Stylelint is primarily focused on CSS and SCSS. Hound will check the formatting and style of Ruby code, including syntax and spacing, whereas Stylelint targets CSS and SCSS properties and selectors.

  2. Customizability: Stylelint offers more extensive customization options compared to Hound. Stylelint allows users to create their own rules, configure rule severity, and apply plugins for specific needs, giving developers more control over the linting process. Hound, on the other hand, has limited customization capabilities.

  3. Community Support: Stylelint benefits from a larger and more active community compared to Hound. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and updates available for Stylelint, making it easier to stay up-to-date with best practices and industry standards. Hound may have a smaller community base in comparison.

  4. Integration: Hound seamlessly integrates with GitHub, providing automated code review within pull requests. This integration simplifies the code review process and ensures that style and formatting issues are addressed early in the development cycle. Stylelint also offers integrations with various editors and build tools but may not have the same level of GitHub integration as Hound.

  5. Rule Set: Hound comes with a predefined set of rules that cannot be altered or expanded by users. Stylelint, on the other hand, allows developers to choose from a wide range of built-in rules or create custom rules according to their specific requirements. This flexibility in rule sets makes Stylelint more adaptable to diverse coding styles and project preferences.

  6. Configuration: Hound requires minimal configuration as it follows a standardized set of rules without much room for modification. In contrast, Stylelint requires more detailed configuration to tailor the linting process to the project's needs, including defining which rules to apply, ignoring certain patterns, and adjusting severity levels for violations.

In Summary, Hound and Stylelint differ in their focus on Ruby and CSS/SCSS, customizability, community support, integration with GitHub, rule set options, and configuration requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hound, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hound
Hound
Stylelint
Stylelint

Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
41
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
47
Followers
100
Votes
14
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Comments on style so I don't have to
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Easy configuration
  • 2
    Free for OSS
  • 2
    Inline comments
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
ESLint
ESLint
GitHub
GitHub
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
RuboCop
RuboCop
Credo
Credo
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Hound, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana