StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Hydra Framework vs Next.js

Hydra Framework vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Hydra Framework
Hydra Framework
Stacks14
Followers48
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks723

Hydra Framework vs Next.js: What are the differences?

  1. Rendering Approach: Hydra Framework is a client-side rendering (CSR) framework, meaning that it renders everything on the client-side which can impact SEO and initial loading times. On the other hand, Next.js supports both server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG), allowing for better performance and SEO optimization.

  2. Routing: Hydra Framework uses a custom routing system that requires additional setup and configuration. In contrast, Next.js has a built-in routing system that simplifies navigation and makes it easier to handle different page transitions.

  3. Data Fetching: Hydra Framework requires manual configuration for data fetching using libraries like Axios or Fetch. Next.js comes with built-in data fetching methods like getServerSideProps and getStaticProps, making it easier to retrieve data from various sources.

  4. Community Support: Next.js has a larger and more active community compared to Hydra Framework, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and community-contributed libraries to enhance development experience and solve common challenges.

  5. Build Time Optimization: Next.js offers features like incremental static regeneration (ISR) and automatic code splitting, which help optimize build times and improve performance by only rebuilding necessary parts of the application when changes occur.

  6. Deployment: Next.js provides seamless deployment options with platforms like Vercel and Netlify, offering features like preview deployments and serverless functions, while Hydra Framework lacks built-in deployment capabilities and requires additional configuration for deployment to various platforms.

In Summary, Next.js offers a more versatile and efficient development experience compared to Hydra Framework, with support for server-side rendering, a robust routing system, easier data fetching methods, a thriving community, build time optimization features, and seamless deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Hydra Framework

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Hydra Framework
Hydra Framework

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

A Python framework that simplifies the development of complex applications

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Hierarchical configuration composable from multiple sources; Configuration can be specified or overridden from the command line; Dynamic command line tab completion; Run your application locally or launch it to run remotely; Run multiple jobs with different arguments with a single command
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
723
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
14
Followers
5.1K
Followers
48
Votes
330
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 1
    Override everything in your config from the command lin
  • 1
    Multirun different jobs with one command
  • 1
    Automatic logging configuration
  • 1
    Automatic working directory per run
  • 1
    Compose your config from the command line
Integrations
React
React
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Hydra Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase