Alternatives to iView logo

Alternatives to iView

ElementUI, Vuetify, Ant Design, Bootstrap, and Element are the most popular alternatives and competitors to iView.
12
48
+ 1
0

What is iView and what are its top alternatives?

iView is a popular JavaScript UI framework that allows developers to create interactive and responsive web interfaces. It provides components like tables, forms, charts, and modals to help streamline the development process. However, one limitation of iView is that it may not have as many customization options as some other frameworks. Additionally, some users find the documentation to be lacking in certain areas, making it challenging for beginners to get started.

  1. Ant Design Vue: Ant Design Vue is a UI framework based on the Ant Design system, providing a vast array of components for building modern web applications. Key features include a responsive design, easy customization, and a range of pre-built components. Pros include extensive documentation and strong community support, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  2. Element UI: Element UI is a Vue.js 2.0-based component library that offers a variety of components and utilities for web development. Key features include a rich set of components, custom themes, and detailed documentation. Pros include flexibility and ease of use, while cons may include performance issues with large-scale applications.
  3. Vuetify: Vuetify is a material design component framework built specifically for Vue.js. It offers a wide range of pre-built components, themes, and icons to help streamline the development process. Pros of Vuetify include extensive customization options and a large community, while some users may find it overwhelming due to the sheer number of features.
  4. Quasar Framework: Quasar Framework is a Vue.js framework that allows developers to build responsive websites, PWAs, SSR, mobile, and desktop applications using the same codebase. Key features include a CLI for quick setup, a wide range of components, and support for a variety of platforms. Pros include flexibility and performance optimization, while cons may include a slightly complex setup process.
  5. Bootstrap Vue: Bootstrap Vue is a Vue.js component library for building responsive web interfaces using Bootstrap. It offers a wide range of components, custom directives, and icons for easier development. Pros of Bootstrap Vue include seamless integration with Bootstrap and easy customization, while cons may include limited flexibility compared to other frameworks.
  6. Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework that provides low-level utility classes to help build custom designs without writing additional CSS. Key features include a responsive grid system, custom themes, and easy integration with JavaScript frameworks. Pros include flexibility and simplicity, while cons may include a learning curve for beginners.
  7. Semantic UI Vue: Semantic UI Vue is a Vue.js integration for Semantic UI, a popular front-end framework known for its clean and semantic HTML design. It offers a range of components and themes to help developers build modern web interfaces. Pros include a clean and consistent design language, while cons may include limited community support compared to other frameworks.
  8. Buefy: Buefy is a lightweight component library for Vue.js based on Bulma, a popular CSS framework. It offers a variety of components, helpers, and utilities for building responsive and mobile-friendly web interfaces. Pros include simplicity and ease of use, while cons may include limited customization options compared to other frameworks.
  9. Materialize: Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. It offers a range of components, themes, and JavaScript interactions for building sleek and intuitive web interfaces. Pros of Materialize include a clean and consistent design language, while cons may include performance issues on certain browsers.
  10. UIKit: UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces. It offers a variety of components, animations, and utilities for building responsive and customizable designs. Pros include a modern and clean design language, while cons may include a smaller community compared to other frameworks.

Top Alternatives to iView

  • ElementUI
    ElementUI

    It is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews. ...

  • Vuetify
    Vuetify

    Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4. ...

  • Ant Design
    Ant Design

    An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Element
    Element

    Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

iView alternatives & related posts

ElementUI logo

ElementUI

69
8
A Desktop UI toolkit for Vue.js
69
8
PROS OF ELEMENTUI
  • 8
    Avaliable for other frontend frameworks too
CONS OF ELEMENTUI
    Be the first to leave a con

    related ElementUI posts

    Sarmad Chaudhary
    Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Hi there!

    I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

    If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

    1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

    2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

    Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

    See more
    Vuetify logo

    Vuetify

    1.2K
    170
    Material Component Framework for VueJS 2
    1.2K
    170
    PROS OF VUETIFY
    • 29
      Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs
    • 24
      Wide range of components and active development
    • 22
      Vue
    • 18
      New age components
    • 13
      Easy integration
    • 11
      Material Design
    • 10
      Nuxt.js
    • 10
      Open Source
    • 6
      Awesome Documentation
    • 5
      Awesome Component collection
    • 5
      Internationalization
    • 5
      Not tied to jQuery
    • 4
      Best use of vue slots you'll ever see
    • 2
      Not tied to jQuery
    • 2
      Treeshaking
    • 2
      Active Community
    • 2
      Responsiveness
    CONS OF VUETIFY
    • 19
      It is heavy
    • 3
      Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)

    related Vuetify posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5.1M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Jeyabalaji Subramanian

    At FundsCorner, when we set out to pick up the front-end tech stack (around Dec 2017), we drove our decision based on the following considerations:

    (1) We were clear that we will NOT have a hybrid app. We will start with Responsive Web & once there is traction, we will rollout our Android App. However, we wanted to ensure that the users have a consistent experience on both the Web & the App. So, the front-end framework must also have a material design component library which we can choose from.

    (2) Before joining FundsCorner as a CTO, I had already worked with Angular. I enjoyed working with Angular, but I felt that I must choose something that will provide us with the fastest time from Concept to Reality.

    (3) I am strong proponent of segregating HTML & JavaScript. I.e. I was not for writing or generating HTML through JavaScript. Because, this will mean that the Front-end developers I have to hire will always be very strong on JavaScript alongside HTML5 & CSS. I was looking for a Framework that was on JavaScript but not HEAVY on JavaScript.

    (3) The first iteration of the web app was to be done by myself. But I was clear that when someone takes up the mantle, they will be able to come up the curve fast.

    In the end, Vue.js and Vuetify satisfied all the above criteria with aplomb! When I did our first POC on Vue.js I could not believe that front-end development could be this fast. The documentation was par excellence and all the required essentials that come along with the Framework (viz. Routing, Store, Validations) etc. were available from the same community! It was also a breeze to integrate with other JavaScript libraries (such as Amazon Cognito).

    By picking Vuetify, we were able to provide a consistent UI experience between our Web App and Native App, besides making the UI development ultra blazing fast!

    In the end, we were able to rollout our Web App in record 6 weeks (that included the end to end Loan Origination flow, Loans management system & Customer engagement module). www.jeyabalaji.com

    See more
    Ant Design logo

    Ant Design

    1.1K
    224
    A set of high-quality React components
    1.1K
    224
    PROS OF ANT DESIGN
    • 48
      Lots of components
    • 33
      Polished and enterprisey look and feel
    • 21
      TypeScript
    • 21
      Easy to integrate
    • 18
      Es6 support
    • 17
      Typescript support
    • 17
      Beautiful and solid
    • 16
      Beautifully Animated Components
    • 15
      Quick Release rhythm
    • 14
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Easy to customize Forms
    • 2
      Opensource and free of cost
    CONS OF ANT DESIGN
    • 24
      Less
    • 10
      Large File Size
    • 4
      Poor accessibility support
    • 3
      Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries

    related Ant Design posts

    Sarmad Chaudhary
    Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Hi there!

    I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

    If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

    1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

    2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

    Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

    See more

    Hello, A question to frontend developers. I am a beginner on frontend.

    I am building a UI for my company to replace old legacy one with React and this question is about choosing how to apply design to it.

    I have Tailwind CSS on one hand and Ant Design on the other (I didnt like mui and Bootstrap doesn't seem to have enterprise components as ant) As far as I understand, tailwind is great. It allows me to literally build an application without touching the css but I have to build my own react components with it. Ant design or mantine has ready to use components which I can use and rapidly build my application.

    My question is, is it the right approach to: - Use a component framework for now and replace legacy app. - Introduce tailwind later when I have a frontend resource in hand and then build own component library

    Thank you.

    See more
    Bootstrap logo

    Bootstrap

    55.5K
    7.7K
    Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
    55.5K
    7.7K
    PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
    • 1.6K
      Responsiveness
    • 1.2K
      UI components
    • 943
      Consistent
    • 779
      Great docs
    • 677
      Flexible
    • 472
      HTML, CSS, and JS framework
    • 411
      Open source
    • 375
      Widely used
    • 368
      Customizable
    • 242
      HTML framework
    • 77
      Popular
    • 77
      Easy setup
    • 77
      Mobile first
    • 58
      Great grid system
    • 52
      Great community
    • 38
      Future compatibility
    • 34
      Integration
    • 28
      Very powerful foundational front-end framework
    • 24
      Standard
    • 23
      Javascript plugins
    • 19
      Build faster prototypes
    • 18
      Preprocessors
    • 14
      Grids
    • 9
      Good for a person who hates CSS
    • 8
      Clean
    • 4
      Love it
    • 4
      Easy to setup and learn
    • 4
      Rapid development
    • 3
      Great and easy to use
    • 2
      Devin schumacher rules
    • 2
      Boostrap
    • 2
      Community
    • 2
      Provide angular wrapper
    • 2
      Great and easy
    • 2
      Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
    • 2
      Great customer support
    • 2
      Popularity
    • 2
      Clean and quick frontend development
    • 2
      Great and easy to make a responsive website
    • 2
      Sprzedam opla
    • 2
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Intuitive
    • 1
      Material-ui
    • 1
      The fame
    • 1
      Numerous components
    • 1
      Responsive design
    • 1
      Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
    • 1
      Easy setup2
    • 1
      Design Agnostic
    • 1
      Painless front end development
    • 1
      So clean and simple
    • 1
      Recognizable
    • 1
      It's fast
    • 1
      Geo
    • 1
      Pre-Defined components
    • 1
      Not tied to jQuery
    • 1
      Love the classes?
    • 1
      Poop
    • 1
      Vue
    CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
    • 26
      Javascript is tied to jquery
    • 16
      Every site uses the defaults
    • 15
      Grid system break points aren't ideal
    • 14
      Too much heavy decoration in default look
    • 8
      Verbose styles
    • 1
      Super heavy

    related Bootstrap posts

    Ganesa Vijayakumar
    Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 6M views

    I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

    I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

    As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

    UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

    Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

    Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

    Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

    Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

    Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

    Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

    Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

    Thanks, Ganesa

    See more
    Francisco Quintero
    Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.8M views

    For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

    What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

    You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

    We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

    Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

    We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

    An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

    Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

    See more
    Element logo

    Element

    86
    3
    A Vue 2.0-based desktop UI library for developers, designers and PMs
    86
    3
    PROS OF ELEMENT
    • 3
      Very complete solution
    CONS OF ELEMENT
    • 2
      Buggy in parts

    related Element posts

    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    371.1K
    8.1K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    371.1K
    8.1K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.7K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.2K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 899
      Fast
    • 746
      Light weight
    • 425
      Flexible
    • 392
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 286
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 237
      Ubiquitousness
    • 191
      Expressive
    • 55
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 49
      Relatively easy language
    • 46
      Executed on the client side
    • 30
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 25
      Pure Javascript
    • 21
      Functional programming
    • 15
      Async
    • 13
      Full-stack
    • 12
      Its everywhere
    • 12
      Future Language of The Web
    • 12
      Setup is easy
    • 11
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 11
      Because I love functions
    • 10
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 9
      Everyone use it
    • 9
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 9
      Easy
    • 9
      Expansive community
    • 8
      For the good parts
    • 8
      Easy to hire developers
    • 8
      No need to use PHP
    • 8
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 8
      Powerful
    • 8
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 7
      It's fun
    • 7
      Its fun and fast
    • 7
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 7
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 7
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 7
      Love-hate relationship
    • 7
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 7
      Evolution of C
    • 7
      Hard not to use
    • 7
      Versitile
    • 7
      Nice
    • 6
      Easy to make something
    • 6
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 6
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 6
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 6
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 5
      Clojurescript
    • 5
      Everywhere
    • 5
      Scope manipulation
    • 5
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 5
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 5
      Promise relationship
    • 5
      Client processing
    • 5
      What to add
    • 4
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 4
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 1
      Subskill #4
    • 1
      Test2
    • 1
      Easy to understand
    • 1
      Not the best
    • 1
      Easy to learn
    • 1
      Hard to learn
    • 1
      Easy to learn and test
    • 1
      Love it
    • 1
      Test
    • 0
      Hard 彤
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 22
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 15
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 9
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 8
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 7
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 6
      Can be ugly
    • 3
      No GitHub
    • 2
      Slow
    • 0
      HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Python logo

    Python

    250.3K
    6.9K
    A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
    250.3K
    6.9K
    PROS OF PYTHON
    • 1.2K
      Great libraries
    • 965
      Readable code
    • 848
      Beautiful code
    • 789
      Rapid development
    • 692
      Large community
    • 439
      Open source
    • 394
      Elegant
    • 283
      Great community
    • 274
      Object oriented
    • 222
      Dynamic typing
    • 78
      Great standard library
    • 62
      Very fast
    • 56
      Functional programming
    • 52
      Easy to learn
    • 47
      Scientific computing
    • 36
      Great documentation
    • 30
      Productivity
    • 29
      Matlab alternative
    • 29
      Easy to read
    • 25
      Simple is better than complex
    • 21
      It's the way I think
    • 20
      Imperative
    • 19
      Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
    • 19
      Free
    • 17
      Powerfull language
    • 17
      Machine learning support
    • 16
      Fast and simple
    • 14
      Scripting
    • 12
      Explicit is better than implicit
    • 11
      Ease of development
    • 10
      Clear and easy and powerfull
    • 9
      Unlimited power
    • 8
      It's lean and fun to code
    • 8
      Import antigravity
    • 7
      Print "life is short, use python"
    • 7
      Python has great libraries for data processing
    • 6
      Although practicality beats purity
    • 6
      Fast coding and good for competitions
    • 6
      There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
    • 6
      High Documented language
    • 6
      Readability counts
    • 6
      Rapid Prototyping
    • 6
      I love snakes
    • 6
      Now is better than never
    • 6
      Flat is better than nested
    • 6
      Great for tooling
    • 5
      Great for analytics
    • 5
      Web scraping
    • 5
      Lists, tuples, dictionaries
    • 4
      Complex is better than complicated
    • 4
      Socially engaged community
    • 4
      Plotting
    • 4
      Beautiful is better than ugly
    • 4
      Easy to learn and use
    • 4
      Easy to setup and run smooth
    • 4
      Simple and easy to learn
    • 4
      Multiple Inheritence
    • 4
      CG industry needs
    • 3
      List comprehensions
    • 3
      Powerful language for AI
    • 3
      Flexible and easy
    • 3
      It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
    • 3
      Many types of collections
    • 3
      If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
    • 3
      If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
    • 3
      Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
    • 3
      Pip install everything
    • 3
      No cruft
    • 3
      Generators
    • 3
      Import this
    • 2
      Can understand easily who are new to programming
    • 2
      Securit
    • 2
      Should START with this but not STICK with This
    • 2
      A-to-Z
    • 2
      Because of Netflix
    • 2
      Only one way to do it
    • 2
      Better outcome
    • 2
      Good for hacking
    • 2
      Batteries included
    • 2
      Procedural programming
    • 1
      Sexy af
    • 1
      Automation friendly
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Best friend for NLP
    • 0
      Powerful
    • 0
      Keep it simple
    • 0
      Ni
    CONS OF PYTHON
    • 53
      Still divided between python 2 and python 3
    • 28
      Performance impact
    • 26
      Poor syntax for anonymous functions
    • 22
      GIL
    • 19
      Package management is a mess
    • 14
      Too imperative-oriented
    • 12
      Hard to understand
    • 12
      Dynamic typing
    • 12
      Very slow
    • 8
      Indentations matter a lot
    • 8
      Not everything is expression
    • 7
      Incredibly slow
    • 7
      Explicit self parameter in methods
    • 6
      Requires C functions for dynamic modules
    • 6
      Poor DSL capabilities
    • 6
      No anonymous functions
    • 5
      Fake object-oriented programming
    • 5
      Threading
    • 5
      The "lisp style" whitespaces
    • 5
      Official documentation is unclear.
    • 5
      Hard to obfuscate
    • 5
      Circular import
    • 4
      Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
    • 4
      The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
    • 4
      Not suitable for autocomplete
    • 2
      Meta classes
    • 1
      Training wheels (forced indentation)

    related Python posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

    Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

    It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

    I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

    What do you think about TensorFlow?

    Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

    See more
    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    192.9K
    8.5K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    192.9K
    8.5K
    PROS OF NODE.JS
    • 1.4K
      Npm
    • 1.3K
      Javascript
    • 1.1K
      Great libraries
    • 1K
      High-performance
    • 805
      Open source
    • 487
      Great for apis
    • 477
      Asynchronous
    • 425
      Great community
    • 390
      Great for realtime apps
    • 296
      Great for command line utilities
    • 86
      Websockets
    • 84
      Node Modules
    • 69
      Uber Simple
    • 59
      Great modularity
    • 58
      Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
    • 42
      Easy to start
    • 35
      Great for Data Streaming
    • 32
      Realtime
    • 28
      Awesome
    • 25
      Non blocking IO
    • 18
      Can be used as a proxy
    • 17
      High performance, open source, scalable
    • 16
      Non-blocking and modular
    • 15
      Easy and Fun
    • 14
      Easy and powerful
    • 13
      Future of BackEnd
    • 13
      Same lang as AngularJS
    • 12
      Fullstack
    • 11
      Fast
    • 10
      Scalability
    • 10
      Cross platform
    • 9
      Simple
    • 8
      Mean Stack
    • 7
      Great for webapps
    • 7
      Easy concurrency
    • 6
      Typescript
    • 6
      Fast, simple code and async
    • 6
      React
    • 6
      Friendly
    • 5
      Control everything
    • 5
      Its amazingly fast and scalable
    • 5
      Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
    • 5
      Scalable
    • 5
      Great speed
    • 5
      Fast development
    • 4
      It's fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Isomorphic coolness
    • 3
      Great community
    • 3
      Not Python
    • 3
      Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
    • 3
      TypeScript Support
    • 3
      Blazing fast
    • 3
      Performant and fast prototyping
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 3
      Easy
    • 3
      Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
    • 3
      One language, end-to-end
    • 3
      Less boilerplate code
    • 2
      Npm i ape-updating
    • 2
      Event Driven
    • 2
      Lovely
    • 1
      Creat for apis
    • 0
      Node
    CONS OF NODE.JS
    • 46
      Bound to a single CPU
    • 45
      New framework every day
    • 40
      Lots of terrible examples on the internet
    • 33
      Asynchronous programming is the worst
    • 24
      Callback
    • 19
      Javascript
    • 11
      Dependency hell
    • 11
      Dependency based on GitHub
    • 10
      Low computational power
    • 7
      Very very Slow
    • 7
      Can block whole server easily
    • 7
      Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
    • 4
      Breaking updates
    • 4
      Unstable
    • 3
      Unneeded over complication
    • 3
      No standard approach
    • 1
      Bad transitive dependency management
    • 1
      Can't read server session

    related Node.js posts

    Anurag Maurya

    Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

    Hello community,

    I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

    I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

    Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

    I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

    For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

    1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

    2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

    3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

    See more