Alternatives to Jami logo

Alternatives to Jami

Jitsi, Zoom, Riot, Skype, and WhatsApp are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Jami.
11
61
+ 1
0

What is Jami and what are its top alternatives?

It is a free software for universal communication which respects freedoms and privacy of its users. Its main goal is to provide a communication framework and end-user applications to make audio or video calls, send text messages and make generic data transfers. It makes this possible via multiple paradigms: a modern decentralized approach using a DHT to find peers or classical centralized SIP as a soft-phone.
Jami is a tool in the Web and Video Conferencing category of a tech stack.
Jami is an open source tool with 122 GitHub stars and 41 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Jami's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Jami

  • Jitsi

    Jitsi

    Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting. ...

  • Zoom

    Zoom

    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...

  • Riot

    Riot

    Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve. ...

  • Skype

    Skype

    Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are. ...

  • WhatsApp

    WhatsApp

    It is a cross-platform mobile messaging app for iPhone, BlackBerry, Android, Windows Phone and Nokia. It allows users to send text messages and voice messages, make voice and video calls, and share images, documents, user locations, and other media. ...

  • Discord

    Discord

    Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover. ...

  • Google Meet

    Google Meet

    It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in. ...

  • WebRTC

    WebRTC

    It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose. ...

Jami alternatives & related posts

Jitsi logo

Jitsi

222
640
92
Multi-platform open-source video conferencing
222
640
+ 1
92
PROS OF JITSI
  • 32
    Open Source
  • 20
    Entirely free conferencing
  • 18
    Unlimited time
  • 5
    Accessible from browser
  • 3
    WebRTC standard
  • 3
    Desktop, app and browser tab sharing
  • 2
    Live stream to youtube
  • 2
    Great API to develop with
  • 2
    Secure & encrypted video conference
  • 1
    Dial-In and Dial-Out via SIP
  • 1
    FSB Approved
  • 1
    Full HD
  • 1
    Share youtube videos in conference
  • 1
    Easy installation and good support
  • 0
    MCU
CONS OF JITSI
  • 6
    UnLimited time
  • 5
    No multiplatform
  • 1
    Good support
  • 1
    Live conference statistics
  • 1
    Great features
  • 1
    Great quality

related Jitsi posts

Shared insights
on
JitsiJitsiZoomZoom

A common issue with Zoom is the "half-duplex" operation, where only one person can speak at a time, and another person speaking will cause an interrupt and take control. Hence the infernal mute button is so needed. Does Jitsi allow for a "full-duplex" communication to occur? An example scenario is two people singing a duet, which is impossible on a Zoom call.

Many Thanks, Garry

See more
Zoom logo

Zoom

1.4K
1.7K
155
Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
1.4K
1.7K
+ 1
155
PROS OF ZOOM
  • 25
    Web conferencing made easy
  • 16
    Remote control option
  • 13
    Draw on screen
  • 12
    Very reliable
  • 11
    In-meeting chat is pretty good
  • 9
    Free
  • 9
    Pair programming sessions with shared controls
  • 8
    Easy to share meeting links/invites
  • 7
    Good Sound Quality
  • 6
    Cloud recordings for meetings
  • 5
    Great mobile app
  • 4
    Recording Feature
  • 4
    Virtual backgrounds
  • 4
    Other people use it
  • 4
    User Friendly actions
  • 2
    Different options for blocking chat
  • 2
    Auto reconnecting
  • 2
    Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
  • 2
    While sharing screen, you can still see your video
  • 2
    Mute all participants at once
  • 2
    When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
  • 2
    Reactions (emoticons)
  • 1
    Easily share video with audio
  • 1
    /zoom on Slack
  • 1
    Registration form
  • 1
    Meant for business and education
  • 0
    Zoom
CONS OF ZOOM
  • 20
    Limited time if you are a basic member
  • 14
    Limited Storage
  • 11
    Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
  • 10
    Quality isn't great (Free)
  • 9
    No cursor highlight on screenshare.
  • 8
    Potential security flaws
  • 7
    Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
  • 5
    Virtual background quality isn't good
  • 5
    Security
  • 4
    Editing can be improved
  • 4
    Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
  • 4
    The native calendar is buggy
  • 4
    Dashboard can be improved
  • 3
    Pornographic material displayed
  • 3
    Any body can get in it
  • 3
    Not many emojis
  • 3
    Past chat history is not saved
  • 3
    Recording Feature
  • 3
    En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
  • 3
    Zoom lags a lot

related Zoom posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Uploadcare is mostly remote team and we're using video conferencing all the time both for internal team meetings and for external sales, support, interview, etc. calls. I think we've tried every solution there is on the market before we've decided to stop with Zoom.

Tools just plainly don't work (Skype), are painful to install for external participants (Webex and other "enterprise" solutions) can't properly handle 10+ participants calls (Google Hangouts Chat).

Zoom just works. It has all required features and even handles bad connections very graciously. One of the best tool decisions we've ever made :)

See more
Shared insights
on
ZoomZoomDiscordDiscord

I want to host an online Jeopardy game with less than 30 participants. During each round of the game, I'll stream some videos. The point is to gather friends together to play the Jeopardy game and watch random stuff. Please let me know if there's a more suitable platform other than Discord and Zoom. Thanks, everyone!

See more
Riot logo

Riot

92
91
68
Simple and elegant component-based UI library
92
91
+ 1
68
PROS OF RIOT
  • 13
    Its just easy... no training wheels needed
  • 13
    Light weight. Fast. Clear
  • 11
    Very simple, fast
  • 9
    Straightforward
  • 6
    Minimalistic
  • 4
    Great documentation
  • 4
    Simpler semantics than other frameworks
  • 3
    Easier than playing Teemo
  • 2
    Great engineering
  • 2
    Light, flexible and library friendly
  • 1
    Mastered under an hour
CONS OF RIOT
  • 1
    Smaller community

related Riot posts

Skype logo

Skype

13.2K
10K
652
Voice calls, instant messaging, file transfer, and video conferencing
13.2K
10K
+ 1
652
PROS OF SKYPE
  • 258
    Free, widespread
  • 147
    Desktop and mobile apps
  • 110
    Because i have to :(
  • 57
    Low cost international calling
  • 56
    Good for international calls
  • 10
    Best call quality anywhere, generally
  • 5
    Beautiful emojis
  • 4
    Chat bots
  • 2
    Translator
  • 1
    User
  • 1
    Skype for business integration with Outlook
  • 1
    Not the Best, but get the job done
CONS OF SKYPE
  • 5
    Really high CPU utilization during video/screenshare
  • 3
    Not always reliable
  • 3
    Outdated UI
  • 3
    Birthday notifications are annoying
  • 3
    The worst indicator noises of any app ever
  • 2
    Finding/adding people isn't easy

related Skype posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Uploadcare is mostly remote team and we're using video conferencing all the time both for internal team meetings and for external sales, support, interview, etc. calls. I think we've tried every solution there is on the market before we've decided to stop with Zoom.

Tools just plainly don't work (Skype), are painful to install for external participants (Webex and other "enterprise" solutions) can't properly handle 10+ participants calls (Google Hangouts Chat).

Zoom just works. It has all required features and even handles bad connections very graciously. One of the best tool decisions we've ever made :)

See more
Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
WhatsApp logo

WhatsApp

279
282
14
A freeware, cross-platform messaging and Voice over IP service
279
282
+ 1
14
PROS OF WHATSAPP
  • 12
    Free
  • 2
    Easy to carry on with contact
CONS OF WHATSAPP
  • 0
    Maximum to 8 person video call

related WhatsApp posts

Discord logo

Discord

1.2K
1.1K
825
All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers that’s free, secure, and works on both your desktop and phone
1.2K
1.1K
+ 1
825
PROS OF DISCORD
  • 59
    Unlimited Users
  • 56
    Unlimited Channels
  • 52
    Easy to use
  • 48
    Voice Chat
  • 48
    Fast and easy set-ups and connections
  • 44
    Clean UI
  • 42
    Mobile Friendly
  • 40
    Free
  • 32
    Android App
  • 27
    Mention system
  • 27
    Customizable notifications on per channel basis
  • 26
    Customizable ranks/permissions
  • 22
    Good code embedding
  • 22
    IOS app
  • 20
    Vast Webhook Support
  • 17
    Dark mode
  • 15
    Roles
  • 15
    Easy context switching between work and home
  • 13
    Great Customer Support
  • 13
    Bot control
  • 13
    Easy to develop for
  • 13
    Great Communities
  • 13
    Very Resource Friendly
  • 12
    Video call meeting
  • 12
    Video Call Conference
  • 12
    Robust
  • 11
    Sharing screen layer
  • 11
    Able to hold 99 people in one call
  • 10
    Easy Server Setup and joining system
  • 10
    Cool
  • 10
    Shares screen with other member
  • 10
    Great browser experience
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    Lower bandwidth requirements than competitors
  • 8
    Better than Zoom
  • 8
    Easy to code bots for
  • 5
    Noice
  • 5
    Everyone look at my con (it's a pro disguised as a con)
  • 4
    Not got wierd emojis like everything made by google
  • 3
    Easily set up custom emoji
CONS OF DISCORD
  • 9
    For gamers
  • 9
    Not as many integrations as Slack
  • 4
    Limited file size
  • 4
    For everyone
  • 4
    Discord is great, what are you talking about?
  • 3
    Sends data to US Gov
  • 2
    Are u mad u ever heard of DMs???
  • 1
    Suspected Pedophiles in few servers
  • 1
    What i mean by this is someone said u cant chat lol
  • 1
    Undescriptive in global ban reasons
  • 1
    Unsupportive Support
  • 0
    Zoom is WAY better bc you can't even chat on Discord

related Discord posts

Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 19 upvotes · 360.6K views

Shortly after I joined Algolia as a developer advocate, I knew I wanted to establish a place for the community to congregate and share their projects, questions and advice. There are a ton of platforms out there that can be used to host communities, and they tend to fall into two categories - real-time sync (like chat) and async (like forums). Because the community was already large, I felt that a chat platform like Discord or Gitter might be overwhelming and opted for a forum-like solution instead (which would also create content that's searchable from Google).

I looked at paid, closed-source options like AnswerHub and ForumBee and old-school solutions like phpBB and vBulletin, but none seemed to offer the power, flexibility and developer-friendliness of Discourse. Discourse is open source, written in Rails with Ember.js on the front-end. That made me confident I could modify it to meet our exact needs. Discourse's own forum is very active which made me confident I could get help if I needed it.

It took about a month to get Discourse up-and-running and make authentication tied to algolia.com via the SSO plugin. Adding additional plugins for moderation or look-and-feel customization was fairly straightforward, and I even created a plugin to make the forum content searchable with Algolia. To stay on top of answering questions and moderation, we used the Discourse API to publish new messages into our Slack. All-in-all I would say we were happy with Discourse - the only caveat would be that it's very helpful to have technical knowledge as well as Rails knowledge in order to get the most out of it.

See more

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

See more
Google Meet logo

Google Meet

394
491
154
A video conferencing app
394
491
+ 1
154
PROS OF GOOGLE MEET
  • 34
    Free
  • 15
    Integrated with G Suite
  • 14
    Group video call
  • 10
    Good to make phone calls
  • 10
    Gmail server integration
  • 9
    Easy to add and remove contacts
  • 9
    Instant Messaging
  • 7
    Unlimited Storage (Premium version)
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    User friendly mobile app
  • 6
    Record (Premium Feature)
  • 5
    Saves the chats for future reference
  • 5
    Browser extension
  • 5
    Accessible from the Browser
  • 3
    No pornography
  • 2
    16 people show at the same time
  • 2
    Meet has the best quality in terms of participant view
  • 2
    Google Meet is never buggy
  • 2
    Amazing captions
  • 2
    Cool emoji extensions
CONS OF GOOGLE MEET
  • 9
    Quality isn't great
  • 5
    Really high CPU utilization during video/screenshare
  • 2
    No client annotation on shared screen
  • 2
    Not great sound quality
  • 2
    Difficult to share video with audio
  • 2
    Needs to take measures to improve the ecosystem
  • 1
    Auto-added to G Cal invites
  • 1
    Needs better support and rollout process
  • 1
    No interactions activities
  • 1
    Overheat cpu on Android
  • 1
    No desktop client
  • 1
    No desktop client

related Google Meet posts

I own an Escape Room. Since right now everyone is practicing social distancing, I would like to run my Escape Room games virtually. I would like to allow approx 4 users to log in to play. They can chitchat a few minutes before their game to get to know each other. Then once the game begins, I will introduce myself and give them the plot to their escape game. I will have a wide-angle camera mounted to the wall to show the room, and as the game master, carry a tablet or webcam around as players talk to me and direct me to show them certain items in the room, move in for closeups in certain areas, try lock combinations, etc. I will be their hands while they solve the puzzles. I am not sure if Google Hangouts Google Meet or Zoom is better for this. I did try it yesterday using google hangout meet and it was good, but I think there may have been a wifi issue where it was choppy. Just trying to figure out the best option. Thank you! Catherine

See more
WebRTC logo

WebRTC

253
405
5
A free, open project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications
253
405
+ 1
5
PROS OF WEBRTC
  • 2
    No Download
  • 2
    OpenSource
  • 1
    You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc
CONS OF WEBRTC
    Be the first to leave a con

    related WebRTC posts

    Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

    See more
    joseph zeiad

    I am trying to implement video calling in a React Native app through Amazon Kinesis. But I was unlucky to find anything related to this on the web. Do you have any example code I can use? or any tutorial? If not, how easy is it to bridge the native library to RN? And what should I use WebRTC or Amazon Chime?? Thanks

    See more