Jami vs WebRTC: What are the differences?
# Introduction
Key differences between Jami and WebRTC:
1. **Protocol and Architecture**: Jami uses a peer-to-peer architecture that allows direct communication between users without the need for a central server, making it more decentralized compared to WebRTC which relies on signaling and communication servers to establish connections.
2. **Security and Privacy**: Jami prioritizes user privacy by implementing end-to-end encryption for all communication. On the other hand, WebRTC only offers encryption as an option, leaving room for potential security vulnerabilities.
3. **Platform Compatibility**: Jami is available on a wide range of platforms including desktop, mobile, and web browsers, while WebRTC is primarily designed for use in web browsers, limiting its accessibility on other devices.
4. **Multi-Device Support**: Jami allows users to synchronize their conversations and contacts across multiple devices seamlessly, providing a consistent user experience. In contrast, WebRTC lacks built-in support for multi-device synchronization.
5. **Community and Development**: Jami is developed and maintained by a non-profit organization focused on user rights and privacy, fostering a strong community-driven approach. WebRTC, on the other hand, is supported by major tech companies, leading to a more corporate-backed development model.
6. **Customization and Extensibility**: Jami offers a more open and customizable framework, allowing developers to tailor the platform to their specific needs. WebRTC, while extensible, is more standardized and may have limitations in terms of customization.
In Summary, Jami and WebRTC differ in their protocol architecture, security measures, platform compatibility, multi-device support, development approach, and customization options.
