StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. JavaFX vs wxWidgets

JavaFX vs wxWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

wxWidgets
wxWidgets
Stacks21
Followers75
Votes19
GitHub Stars6.9K
Forks1.9K
JavaFX
JavaFX
Stacks280
Followers418
Votes11

JavaFX vs wxWidgets: What are the differences?

Key Differences between JavaFX and wxWidgets

JavaFX and wxWidgets are both frameworks used for creating graphical user interfaces (GUIs) in different programming languages. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Programming Language Support: JavaFX is mainly designed for creating GUI applications in Java, while wxWidgets supports multiple programming languages, including C++, Python, and others. This language support gives developers more flexibility in choosing their preferred programming language.

  2. Platform Dependence: JavaFX applications can be run on any platform that supports Java, making them platform independent. On the other hand, wxWidgets applications can be compiled for different platforms, but they still require specific platform-dependent code to handle GUI components.

  3. GUI Style: JavaFX follows a more modern and visually appealing GUI style, providing a rich set of UI controls and effects. On the other hand, wxWidgets provides a more native look and feel, adapting to the specific platform's GUI style. This can be advantageous for creating applications that seamlessly integrate with the target platform.

  4. Ease of Use: JavaFX provides a more intuitive and declarative way of creating GUIs using FXML (FXML Markup Language). This makes it easier for designers and developers to work together and separates the UI design from the application logic. Conversely, wxWidgets requires more low-level coding and manual positioning of GUI components, which may be more suitable for developers with a strong background in GUI programming.

  5. Integration with Other Technologies: JavaFX has strong integration with other Java technologies and frameworks, such as Java EE, allowing developers to build enterprise-level applications. On the other hand, wxWidgets lacks similar extensive integration with other technologies, focusing more on providing a solid foundation for building cross-platform GUI applications.

  6. Community and Development Support: JavaFX benefits from a large and active community as it is a part of the Java ecosystem. This results in better support, frequent updates, and a wide range of available libraries and resources. In contrast, while wxWidgets also has an active community, it may be relatively smaller compared to JavaFX, resulting in fewer third-party libraries and resources.

In summary, JavaFX provides a modern GUI framework with strong language support, platform independence, and integration with Java technologies, while wxWidgets offers a more native look and feel, multi-language support, and a more manual approach to GUI development. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements of the project and the developer's familiarity with the programming language and GUI development approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

wxWidgets
wxWidgets
JavaFX
JavaFX

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

Support for gesture events (GSoC 2017 project); Getting JavaScript code return value from wxWebView (also GSoC 2017 project); New wxSecretStore class for securely storing user passwords; New, available in parallel with the existing one, CMake build system; Support for context-sensitive translations.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
280
Followers
75
Followers
418
Votes
19
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Native looking UI
  • 4
    Learning Curve
  • 3
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Permissive license. Commercial with static linkage.
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Uses Qt for GUI (wxQt)
Pros
  • 11
    Light
Cons
  • 1
    Complicated
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
Integrations
Perl
Perl
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
macOS
macOS
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to wxWidgets, JavaFX?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase