JAWS vs Play

Overview

Play

Stacks752

Followers609

Votes496

GitHub Stars12.6K

Forks4.1K

JAWS

Stacks6

Followers50

Votes2

JAWS vs Play: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between JAWS and Play, specifically focusing on their functionalities and use cases.

## 1. Accessibility Features:
JAWS is a screen reading software specifically designed for individuals with visual impairments, providing speech and Braille output to navigate computer systems. On the other hand, Play is a web application framework that focuses on building interactive and dynamic web applications without specific accessibility features.

## 2. Target Users:
JAWS is primarily targeted towards visually impaired users who rely on speech and Braille output for computer navigation. In contrast, Play is targeted at web developers and businesses looking to create robust web applications with a seamless user experience, regardless of disability.

## 3. Application Usage:
JAWS is used as an assistive technology tool to access and interact with various computer applications and content for visually impaired users. Play, on the other hand, is used by developers to create dynamic web applications that enhance user experience through interactivity and data management functionalities.

## 4. Licensing Model:
JAWS follows a paid licensing model where users are required to purchase a license for personal or commercial use. On the contrary, Play is an open-source framework that is free to use, providing developers with the flexibility to customize and modify the code as per their project requirements.

## 5. Development Approach:
Developing applications with JAWS requires a focus on accessible design principles and compatibility with screen reading software. In contrast, development with Play involves utilizing the framework's tools and features to create responsive and interactive web applications tailored to specific business needs.

## 6. Compatibility:
JAWS is compatible with various operating systems and applications to provide accessibility features universally. However, Play is more focused on web development compatibility, ensuring seamless integration with web technologies and frameworks for enhanced user experience.

In Summary, the key differences between JAWS and Play lie in their target users, application usage, licensing model, development approach, and compatibility, with JAWS catering to visually impaired users and Play focusing on web development functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Play, JAWS

Leonardo

Project manager and web developer at Revo Digital

Mar 22, 2021

Needs adviceon

TypeScript

Rails

Scala

In the past few months, a project we're working on grew up quite fast. Since we're adding more and more features, I'm considering migrating my Express/TS REST API towards a more solid and more "enterprise-like" framework. Since I am experienced with TypeScript but not so much with Rails nor Play (Scala), I'd like to have some advice on which one could provide the best development experience, and most importantly, the smoothest paradigm transition from the JS/TS world. I've worked on some personal project with Rails, but I've found the Ruby language really distant from what the TypeScript ecosystem and syntax are, whereas on the opposite - during the brief tours I've taken in the past weeks - it's been a pleasure coding in Scala. Obviously, there are some key differences between the two languages - and the two frameworks consequently - but despite all the ROR automation and ease of use I don't despise at all Scala's pragmatic and great features such as static typing, pattern matching, and type inference. So... Please help me out with the choice! Regards

2.74M views2.74M

Comments

Hosam

Senior Software Engineer

Apr 18, 2021

Review

If software performance is your top priority, then Scala/Play is probably best. If developer productivity is your top priority, then Ruby on Rails is the best choice in my opinion.

The Rails framework is batteries-included. The framework takes care of many things by default so that you don't have to. Logging, security, etc. It's also well-integrated; for example, controllers understand models out of the box. I had a better experience with RoR than with Play.

On the other hand, Scala and the JVM are more performant in general, so they can scale to serve more requests per second on the same hardware.

If you're considering serverless functions, then Scala is probably a better choice because it would be faster to load, giving you better economics.

53.4k views53.4k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Play	JAWS
Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.	The Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services that redefine how to build massively scalable web applications
-	Use No Servers: Never deal with scaling/deploying/maintaing/monitoring servers again.;Isolated Components: The JAWS back-end is comprised entirely of AWS Lambda Functions. ;Scale Infinitely: A back-end comprised of Lambda functions comes with a ton of concurrency and you can easily enable multi-region redundancy.;Be Cheap As Possible: Lambda functions run only when they are called, and you only pay for when they are run.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 752	Stacks 6
Followers 609	Followers 50
Votes 496	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 81 Scala 55 Web-friendly architecture 55 Built on akka 50 Stateless 47 High-scalable Cons 3 Evolves fast, keep up with releases 1 Unnecessarily complicated	Pros 2 Heroku
Integrations
No integrations available	AWS Lambda Amazon DynamoDB Amazon API Gateway Amazon S3 JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Play, JAWS?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

JAWS vs Play: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between JAWS and Play, specifically focusing on their functionalities and use cases.

## 1. Accessibility Features:
JAWS is a screen reading software specifically designed for individuals with visual impairments, providing speech and Braille output to navigate computer systems. On the other hand, Play is a web application framework that focuses on building interactive and dynamic web applications without specific accessibility features.

## 2. Target Users:
JAWS is primarily targeted towards visually impaired users who rely on speech and Braille output for computer navigation. In contrast, Play is targeted at web developers and businesses looking to create robust web applications with a seamless user experience, regardless of disability.

## 3. Application Usage:
JAWS is used as an assistive technology tool to access and interact with various computer applications and content for visually impaired users. Play, on the other hand, is used by developers to create dynamic web applications that enhance user experience through interactivity and data management functionalities.

## 4. Licensing Model:
JAWS follows a paid licensing model where users are required to purchase a license for personal or commercial use. On the contrary, Play is an open-source framework that is free to use, providing developers with the flexibility to customize and modify the code as per their project requirements.

## 5. Development Approach:
Developing applications with JAWS requires a focus on accessible design principles and compatibility with screen reading software. In contrast, development with Play involves utilizing the framework's tools and features to create responsive and interactive web applications tailored to specific business needs.

## 6. Compatibility:
JAWS is compatible with various operating systems and applications to provide accessibility features universally. However, Play is more focused on web development compatibility, ensuring seamless integration with web technologies and frameworks for enhanced user experience.

JAWS vs Play

Overview