Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

Kendo UI

Stacks297

Followers359

Votes33

GitHub Stars2.6K

Forks1.9K

Kendo UI vs jQuery: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
Kendo UI and jQuery are two popular JavaScript libraries used for web development, each offering a distinct set of capabilities and functionalities.

1. **UI Components:** Kendo UI provides a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components such as grids, charts, and calendars, with customizable themes, while jQuery focuses on DOM manipulation and simplifying JavaScript interactions on web pages.
2. **Data Binding:** Kendo UI offers built-in data binding capabilities for its UI components, making it easier to connect data with visual elements, whereas jQuery requires more manual handling of data binding and manipulation.
3. **Mobile Support:** Kendo UI is optimized for mobile development, providing touch-enabled UI components and responsive design out of the box, unlike jQuery which needs additional plugins or custom coding for mobile compatibility.
4. **Enterprise Features:** Kendo UI includes features tailored for enterprise applications such as accessibility compliance, globalization support, and integration with enterprise systems, compared to jQuery which is more focused on lightweight, general-purpose web development.
5. **Documentation and Support:** Kendo UI offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and dedicated support options, ensuring developers have resources to troubleshoot issues and learn how to use the library effectively, while jQuery relies heavily on community forums and external resources for support.
6. **License Model:** Kendo UI follows a commercial licensing model for its advanced features and support, suitable for businesses seeking premium solutions, whereas jQuery is open-source and free to use, making it ideal for small projects and personal use.

In Summary, Kendo UI differentiates itself from jQuery with its rich set of UI components, data binding capabilities, mobile support, enterprise features, extensive documentation, and commercial licensing model.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

FigForm UI Components

FigForm

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

1

2

Advice on jQuery, Kendo UI

Adan

designer, programmer at Downdijk

Aug 8, 2021

Needs adviceon

jQuery

Bootstrap

JavaScript

I use jQuery at the moment because I use it for a lot of years already, but now Bootstrap 5 decided to switch to JavaScript, I am thinking of switching to an alternative.

I use jQuery only for the DOM integration, animations and ajax calls because JavaScript calls to a class looks such a long call. I like the way of jQuery with $(document).on('click','.something',function() {});

By the way, I like to keep using HTML, PHP and Bootstrap as I do now.

28.8k views28.8k

Comments

Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.4k views72.4k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	Kendo UI
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.
-	Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars 2.6K
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks 1.9K
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 297
Followers 70.6K	Followers 359
Votes 6.6K	Votes 33
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	Pros 15 Collection of controls 5 Speed 4 Mobile 4 Multi-framework support 2 Built-in router Cons 4 Massive footprint 3 Slow 1 Poor customizability 1 Awdawd 1 Expensive
Integrations
No integrations available	Bootstrap AngularJS

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Kendo UI?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).