Overview

OpenLDAP

Stacks95

Followers132

Votes0

JSON Web Token

Stacks1.8K

Followers367

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.7K

Forks374

JSON Web Token vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to web authentication and authorization, JSON Web Token (JWT) and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) are two commonly used technologies. While both serve the purpose of user authentication, they differ in fundamental aspects. Below are the key differences between JSON Web Token and LDAP.

Data Structure: JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. On the other hand, LDAP is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services over an IP network.
Usage: JWT is commonly used for stateless authentication mechanisms in web applications where the token is generated on the server and sent to the client for further requests. In contrast, LDAP is primarily used for centralized authentication and authorization in large organizations through a central directory server.
Security Level: JWT provides security through digital signatures or encryption, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality during transmission. LDAP, on the other hand, relies on network security measures and the protection of directory servers, which may introduce potential vulnerabilities.
Scalability: JWT tokens can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more servers to the system, making it suitable for high-traffic websites or microservices architectures. LDAP, however, may face scalability issues when handling a large number of user authentication requests due to the centralized nature of directory servers.
Authentication Mechanism: JWT is a token-based authentication system where authentication is done based on the verification of the token's signature and claims. Meanwhile, LDAP uses a query-based authentication mechanism where the client sends requests to the LDAP server to validate user credentials.
Protocol Dependency: JWT operates independently of any specific protocol and can be used across different platforms and technologies. In contrast, LDAP is closely tied to the LDAP protocol, which may limit its interoperability with other authentication systems.

In Summary, JSON Web Token and LDAP differ in data structure, usage, security level, scalability, authentication mechanism, and protocol dependency.

🔥 Trending in Authentication on StackShare

Digital KYC & eSign Solutions Authentication

Digital KYC & eSign Solutions

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

OpenLDAP	JSON Web Token
It is a free, open-source implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Lightweight Directory Access is an application protocol that is used to crosscheck information on the server end.	JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.
-	compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 374
Stacks 95	Stacks 1.8K
Followers 132	Followers 367
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to OpenLDAP, JSON Web Token?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.