Karma vs Wallaby.js

Overview

Karma

Stacks4.8K

Followers603

Votes181

GitHub Stars12.0K

Forks1.7K

Wallaby.js

Stacks10

Followers18

Votes0

Karma vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In the world of frontend development, tools like Karma and Wallaby.js are often used for testing JavaScript code. Understanding the key differences between these two tools is essential for choosing the right one for your projects.

1. **Execution Speed**: Wallaby.js is known for its blazing fast execution speed, providing real-time feedback on code changes almost instantaneously. On the other hand, Karma may take more time to run tests, especially with larger test suites.
   
2. **Continuous Testing**: Wallaby.js is designed to provide continuous testing, meaning it runs your tests as you write code and provides immediate feedback in your editor. Karma, on the other hand, typically requires manual triggering to run tests.
   
3. **IDE Integration**: Wallaby.js offers seamless integration with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code and JetBrains products, providing a more convenient testing experience within the editor. Karma, while still compatible with various editors, may require additional configurations for full integration.
   
4. **Debugging Capabilities**: Wallaby.js provides advanced debugging capabilities, allowing developers to debug their tests directly within their editor. Karma, on the other hand, may require additional setup and tools for efficient debugging.
   
5. **Community Support**: Karma has been around for longer and has a larger community of users, leading to more extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins. Wallaby.js, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.
   
6. **Cost**: While Karma is an open-source tool, Wallaby.js offers both free and paid versions with additional features like performance optimizations, parallel testing, and support for various frameworks. Depending on your needs and budget, this difference may influence your choice.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Karma and Wallaby.js, such as execution speed, continuous testing, IDE integration, debugging capabilities, community support, and cost, is crucial for making an informed decision when selecting a testing tool for your JavaScript projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Karma	Wallaby.js
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.	It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.
Test on Real Devices;Remote Control;Testing Framework Agnostic;Open Source;Easy Debugging;Continuous Integration	Continuous Testing and TDD/BDD for JavaScript, CoffeeScript and TypeScript, Webpack, Browserify, ES6, ES7, node.js, Jest
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 4.8K	Stacks 10
Followers 603	Followers 18
Votes 181	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 61 Test Runner 35 Open source 27 Continuous Integration 22 Great for running tests 18 Test on Real Devices Cons 1 Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically 1 Slow, because tests are run in a real browser	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jasmine Mocha	QUnit Jest Jasmine Mocha

What are some alternatives to Karma, Wallaby.js?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Karma vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In the world of frontend development, tools like Karma and Wallaby.js are often used for testing JavaScript code. Understanding the key differences between these two tools is essential for choosing the right one for your projects.

1. **Execution Speed**: Wallaby.js is known for its blazing fast execution speed, providing real-time feedback on code changes almost instantaneously. On the other hand, Karma may take more time to run tests, especially with larger test suites.
   
2. **Continuous Testing**: Wallaby.js is designed to provide continuous testing, meaning it runs your tests as you write code and provides immediate feedback in your editor. Karma, on the other hand, typically requires manual triggering to run tests.
   
3. **IDE Integration**: Wallaby.js offers seamless integration with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code and JetBrains products, providing a more convenient testing experience within the editor. Karma, while still compatible with various editors, may require additional configurations for full integration.
   
4. **Debugging Capabilities**: Wallaby.js provides advanced debugging capabilities, allowing developers to debug their tests directly within their editor. Karma, on the other hand, may require additional setup and tools for efficient debugging.
   
5. **Community Support**: Karma has been around for longer and has a larger community of users, leading to more extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins. Wallaby.js, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.
   
6. **Cost**: While Karma is an open-source tool, Wallaby.js offers both free and paid versions with additional features like performance optimizations, parallel testing, and support for various frameworks. Depending on your needs and budget, this difference may influence your choice.

Karma vs Wallaby.js

Overview