What is Kestra and what are its top alternatives?
Kestra is a data orchestration tool designed to automate data pipelines and workflows. It offers features such as visual workflow design, job scheduling, data monitoring, and error handling. However, Kestra can be complex to set up and requires a learning curve for users unfamiliar with data orchestration tools.
- Apache NiFi: Apache NiFi is a powerful data ingestion and distribution tool with a user-friendly interface for designing data flows. It offers features like data provenance tracking, data encryption, and scalability. Pros include a large and active community, while cons include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
- Airflow: Apache Airflow is a platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows. It offers features such as a rich user interface, dynamic workflows, and extensibility through plugins. Pros include strong DAG visualization capabilities, while cons include potential performance issues with large-scale workflows.
- Prefect: Prefect is a modern workflow orchestration tool focused on developer experience and reliability. It offers features like version-controlled workflows, advanced scheduling, and customizable notifications. Pros include a Python-native API, while cons may include limited out-of-the-box integrations compared to other tools.
- Luigi: Luigi is a Python package to build complex pipelines and batch processes. It offers features such as workflow visualization, dependency resolution, and task prioritization. Pros include simplicity in defining workflows, while cons may include a less intuitive user interface compared to some other tools.
- dbt: dbt (data build tool) is an open-source tool for transforming data in your warehouse more effectively. It offers features like data modeling, testing, and documentation generation. Pros include a focus on SQL-based transformations, while cons may include limitations in handling non-SQL transformations.
- Dagster: Dagster is a data orchestrator built for the demands of modern data ecosystems. It offers features like declarative pipelines, reusability of data assets, and data lineage tracking. Pros include a strong emphasis on data quality, while cons may include a smaller community compared to more established tools.
- Conductor: Netflix's Conductor is a microservices orchestrator that provides a complete toolset for scheduling and running workflows. It offers features like distributed execution, metadata storage, and dynamic scaling. Pros include integration with Netflix's ecosystem, while cons may include a more specialized focus compared to general-purpose tools.
- Pinball: Pinball is an open-source workflow manager developed by Pinterest. It offers features like DAG visualization, job scheduling, and failure handling. Pros include easy integration with existing systems, while cons may include a smaller user base compared to more widely adopted tools.
- Digdag: Digdag is a simple tool that turns your big data tasks into a series of tasks, making it easy to process and visualize data. It offers features like workflow definition in YAML, task dependencies, and scheduling. Pros include ease of use, while cons may include a smaller feature set compared to more comprehensive tools.
- Oozie: Apache Oozie is a workflow scheduler system to manage Hadoop jobs. It offers features like workflow scheduling, job coordination, and monitoring. Pros include integration with the Hadoop ecosystem, while cons may include a complex XML-based workflow definition.
Top Alternatives to Kestra
- GitHub Actions
It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want. ...
- Airflow
Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed. ...
- Camunda
With Camunda, business users collaborate with developers to model and automate end-to-end processes using BPMN-powered flowcharts that run with the speed, scale, and resiliency required to compete in today’s digital-first world ...
- Apache Beam
It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments. ...
- Luigi
It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in. ...
- Workflowy
It is an organizational tool that makes life easier. It's a surprisingly powerful way to take notes, make lists, collaborate, brainstorm, plan and generally organize your brain. ...
- Apache Oozie
It is a server-based workflow scheduling system to manage Hadoop jobs. Workflows in it are defined as a collection of control flow and action nodes in a directed acyclic graph. Control flow nodes define the beginning and the end of a workflow as well as a mechanism to control the workflow execution path. ...
- K2
Drive process excellence across your organization by connecting people, systems, and data to orchestrate how and when work gets done. ...
Kestra alternatives & related posts
- Integration with GitHub8
- Free5
- Easy to duplicate a workflow3
- Ready actions in Marketplace3
- Configs stored in .github2
- Docker Support2
- Read actions in Marketplace2
- Active Development Roadmap1
- Fast1
- Lacking [skip ci]5
- Lacking allow failure4
- Lacking job specific badges3
- No ssh login to servers2
- No Deployment Projects1
- No manual launch1
related GitHub Actions posts
I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and Github Actions to cover my #CI/ CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.
Thanks in advance!
Hello Everyone, Can some please help me to understand the difference between GitHub Actions And GitLab I have been trying to understand them, but still did not get how exactly they are different.
Airflow
- Features51
- Task Dependency Management14
- Beautiful UI12
- Cluster of workers12
- Extensibility10
- Open source6
- Complex workflows5
- Python5
- Good api3
- Apache project3
- Custom operators3
- Dashboard2
- Observability is not great when the DAGs exceed 2502
- Running it on kubernetes cluster relatively complex2
- Open source - provides minimum or no support2
- Logical separation of DAGs is not straight forward1
related Airflow posts
I am working on a project that grabs a set of input data from AWS S3, pre-processes and divvies it up, spins up 10K batch containers to process the divvied data in parallel on AWS Batch, post-aggregates the data, and pushes it to S3.
I already have software patterns from other projects for Airflow + Batch but have not dealt with the scaling factors of 10k parallel tasks. Airflow is nice since I can look at which tasks failed and retry a task after debugging. But dealing with that many tasks on one Airflow EC2 instance seems like a barrier. Another option would be to have one task that kicks off the 10k containers and monitors it from there.
I have no experience with AWS Step Functions but have heard it's AWS's Airflow. There looks to be plenty of patterns online for Step Functions + Batch. Do Step Functions seem like a good path to check out for my use case? Do you get the same insights on failing jobs / ability to retry tasks as you do with Airflow?
I am looking for an open-source scheduler tool with cross-functional application dependencies. Some of the tasks I am looking to schedule are as follows:
- Trigger Matillion ETL loads
- Trigger Attunity Replication tasks that have downstream ETL loads
- Trigger Golden gate Replication Tasks
- Shell scripts, wrappers, file watchers
- Event-driven schedules
I have used Airflow in the past, and I know we need to create DAGs for each pipeline. I am not familiar with Jenkins, but I know it works with configuration without much underlying code. I want to evaluate both and appreciate any advise
related Camunda posts
- Open-source5
- Cross-platform5
- Portable2
- Unified batch and stream processing2
related Apache Beam posts
I have to build a data processing application with an Apache Beam stack and Apache Flink runner on an Amazon EMR cluster. I saw some instability with the process and EMR clusters that keep going down. Here, the Apache Beam application gets inputs from Kafka and sends the accumulative data streams to another Kafka topic. Any advice on how to make the process more stable?
- Hadoop Support5
- Python3
- Open soure1