StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs LDAP

Keycloak vs LDAP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102
LDAP
LDAP
Stacks76
Followers70
Votes0

Keycloak vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Keycloak and LDAP. Keycloak is an open-source software product that provides single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, while LDAP is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services.

  1. Architecture: Keycloak follows a client-server architecture, where the server handles authentication, authorization, and user management. On the other hand, LDAP is a protocol that can be implemented by various directory servers, such as Microsoft Active Directory or OpenLDAP.

  2. User Management: Keycloak provides a user-friendly administrative console and REST APIs to manage users, roles, and permissions. It also supports features like self-registration and social logins. In contrast, LDAP requires administrators to have technical knowledge to manage users and groups using the LDAP directory server's administrative interface.

  3. Integration: Keycloak can integrate with various identity providers like Google, Facebook, or Active Directory, making it easier to use existing identity sources. LDAP, on the other hand, is a standalone protocol and does not have built-in support for integrating with external identity providers.

  4. Standard Compliance: Keycloak supports modern authentication protocols such as OpenID Connect and SAML. It is also compliant with security standards like OAuth 2.0 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). LDAP, on the other hand, is an older protocol that does not have native support for these modern authentication standards.

  5. Scalability and High Availability: Keycloak can be deployed in a cluster to provide high availability and scalability. It uses a distributed cache to share session state across the cluster. LDAP, on the other hand, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve high availability and scalability.

  6. Ease of Use: Keycloak provides a user-friendly interface for managing users, roles, and permissions. It also provides a comprehensive documentation that makes it easier for developers and administrators to understand and work with the system. LDAP, on the other hand, requires technical knowledge and may have a steeper learning curve.

In Summary, Keycloak provides a user-friendly, scalable, and standards-compliant solution for single sign-on, while LDAP is a protocol used for directory access and lacks some of the modern features and ease of use provided by Keycloak.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, LDAP

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
LDAP
LDAP

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

-
Lightweight directory access protocol; Used for authentication and storing information; General-purpose data store
Statistics
Stacks
780
Stacks
76
Followers
1.3K
Followers
70
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, LDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope