StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs OAuth2

Keycloak vs OAuth2

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0
Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102

Keycloak vs OAuth2: What are the differences?

Keycloak and OAuth2 are authentication and authorization frameworks used in web applications. While both provide similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Standard vs. Implementation: OAuth2 is an open standard protocol for authorization, while Keycloak is an open source implementation of the OAuth2 protocol. This means that OAuth2 defines the overall framework and Keycloak provides a specific implementation of it.

  2. Single Sign-On (SSO): Keycloak is designed to support Single Sign-On (SSO) out of the box. It allows users to authenticate once and then access multiple applications without needing to re-authenticate. OAuth2, on the other hand, does not inherently support SSO and requires additional implementation to achieve it.

  3. User Management: Keycloak provides built-in user management features, allowing administrators to create and manage users, roles, and permissions. OAuth2, being a protocol, does not provide user management functionalities by default and requires integration with an external identity provider or user management system.

  4. Token Validation: Keycloak has built-in token validation capabilities, which means it can validate access tokens issued by itself or any other OAuth2 authorization server. While OAuth2 does provide a standard mechanism for token validation, the implementation is left to individual authorization servers.

  5. Security Ecosystem: Keycloak provides additional security features like two-factor authentication, social login integration, and support for various federation protocols (such as SAML and OpenID Connect). OAuth2, being a standard, does not provide these security features by default and relies on external components for their implementation.

  6. Ease of Use: Keycloak aims to provide a fully-featured authentication and authorization solution with a user-friendly interface for configuration and administration. OAuth2, being a protocol, requires additional effort and expertise to set up and configure, as it only defines the overall flow and mechanisms.

In summary, Keycloak is an open-source implementation of the OAuth2 protocol that provides additional features such as SSO, user management, and enhanced security. OAuth2, as a standard, defines the framework for authorization but requires additional components and configuration to achieve the same level of functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OAuth2, Keycloak

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OAuth2
OAuth2
Keycloak
Keycloak

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Statistics
Stacks
683
Stacks
780
Followers
650
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side

What are some alternatives to OAuth2, Keycloak?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope