StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs Passport

Keycloak vs Passport

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Passport
Passport
Stacks471
Followers368
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.5K
Forks1.2K
Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102

Keycloak vs Passport: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison of Keycloak and Passport, highlighting the key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: Keycloak is a standalone open-source identity and access management solution, while Passport is a middleware for authentication in Node.js applications.

  2. Authentication Support: Keycloak offers extensive authentication support by providing support for various authentication methods and protocols, such as OAuth2, OpenID Connect, and SAML. Passport, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a simple authentication middleware for Node.js applications and relies on strategies for authentication.

  3. Integration: Keycloak provides seamless integration with various technologies and frameworks, including Java, Spring Boot, and JavaScript. Passport, being a middleware for Node.js, integrates well with Node.js frameworks and libraries.

  4. User Management: Keycloak offers a comprehensive user management system, allowing administrators to manage users, roles, and permissions. Passport, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in user management system and requires developers to implement their own user management logic.

  5. Enterprise Features: Keycloak offers additional features suitable for enterprise use, such as single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access control. Passport, being a lightweight middleware, focuses more on providing a basic authentication layer.

  6. Community Support: Keycloak has a large and active community that provides support, documentation, and regular updates. Passport also has a supportive community but may not have the same level of resources and community contributions as Keycloak.

In summary, Keycloak is a comprehensive standalone identity and access management solution with extensive authentication support, enterprise features, and a large community, while Passport is a lightweight authentication middleware for Node.js applications with a focus on simplicity and integration with Node.js frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Passport, Keycloak

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Passport
Passport
Keycloak
Keycloak

It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
471
Stacks
780
Followers
368
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
Integrations
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Passport, Keycloak?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope