StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs sso

Keycloak vs sso

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102
sso
sso
Stacks38
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.1K
Forks191

Keycloak vs sso: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Keycloak and SSO (Single Sign-On).

  1. User Authentication and Authorization: Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution that provides comprehensive user authentication and authorization services. It allows organizations to secure their applications and services by managing user identities, roles, and permissions. SSO, on the other hand, is a concept that enables users to log in once and be authenticated across multiple applications or systems. While Keycloak offers SSO functionality along with additional features, SSO can be implemented using various protocols and frameworks without the need for a dedicated identity and access management system.

  2. Customization and Extensibility: Keycloak provides a highly customizable and extensible platform for managing user identities and integrating with various authentication and authorization mechanisms. It offers fine-grained control over user registration, password policies, and user attribute management. SSO solutions, on the other hand, may have limited customization options and may require additional development efforts to integrate with existing systems or applications.

  3. Integration with External Identity Providers: Keycloak allows seamless integration with popular external identity providers such as social media platforms (e.g., Google, Facebook) and enterprise identity providers (e.g., Active Directory, LDAP). It supports various identity protocols like OpenID Connect, SAML, and OAuth2 for federated authentication and single sign-on. SSO solutions may also support integration with external identity providers but may have limitations in terms of supported protocols or customization options.

  4. Multi-factor Authentication: Keycloak provides built-in support for multi-factor authentication (MFA) options such as one-time passwords (OTP), biometrics, and email verification. It allows organizations to enforce additional security measures for user authentication. SSO solutions may support MFA, but the availability and customization options may vary depending on the specific implementation.

  5. Administration and User Management: Keycloak provides a comprehensive administration console for managing users, roles, permissions, and client applications. It offers features like user self-registration, password reset, and user attribute management. SSO solutions may have limited administration and user management capabilities, focusing primarily on authentication and SSO functionality.

  6. Scalability and High Availability: Keycloak supports horizontal scalability and high availability through clustering and load balancing. It can be deployed in a distributed architecture to handle high user loads and ensure high availability of authentication and authorization services. SSO solutions may also support scalability and high availability, but the specific implementation may vary depending on the chosen framework or protocol.

In summary, Keycloak is a feature-rich identity and access management system that provides extensive authentication, authorization, and user management capabilities, along with SSO functionality. SSO, on the other hand, is a concept that enables users to log in once and access multiple applications without the need for repeated authentication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, sso

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
sso
sso

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

The authentication and authorization system BuzzFeed developed to provide a secure, single sign-on experience for access to the many internal web apps used by our employees.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
191
Stacks
780
Stacks
38
Followers
1.3K
Followers
89
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, sso?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope