StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. KubeDB vs Portworx

KubeDB vs Portworx

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KubeDB
KubeDB
Stacks10
Followers28
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Portworx
Portworx
Stacks21
Followers58
Votes0
GitHub Stars271
Forks84

KubeDB vs Portworx: What are the differences?

Introduction

KubeDB and Portworx are popular tools used in Kubernetes environments for managing databases and storage, respectively. While both serve critical functions, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Data Management Approach: KubeDB focuses on providing operators for various databases, simplifying database tasks such as backup, restore, and scaling. In contrast, Portworx is primarily a cloud-native storage platform that offers data services like replication, encryption, and snapshots across different clouds and Kubernetes clusters.

  2. Integration with Kubernetes: KubeDB is tightly integrated with Kubernetes and follows the native Kubernetes API conventions, making it easier to manage databases as Kubernetes resources. On the other hand, Portworx interfaces directly with Kubernetes storage APIs to provide persistent storage that can be dynamically provisioned and managed.

  3. Use Cases: KubeDB is more suited for managing stateful workloads that require databases to be managed within Kubernetes clusters, offering specific solutions for different database types like MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, etc. In contrast, Portworx is ideal for organizations looking to run high-performance, stateful applications that require scalable and resilient storage solutions across multiple environments.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Portworx is designed to deliver high availability, data protection, and performance optimization for storage in high-demand scenarios, making it suitable for mission-critical applications. KubeDB, on the other hand, focuses on simplifying database operations within the Kubernetes ecosystem without the specific emphasis on storage performance.

  5. Community Support: KubeDB has an active open-source community, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and new features to enhance database management capabilities within Kubernetes. Portworx also has a robust community backing but primarily focuses on storage-related functionalities like data mobility, disaster recovery, and security.

  6. Deployment Flexibility: While both KubeDB and Portworx can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, KubeDB's primary focus is on managing databases within Kubernetes clusters, whereas Portworx caters to storage needs across various infrastructure environments, including hybrid and multi-cloud setups.

In Summary, KubeDB and Portworx differ in their primary focus on database management versus storage solutions, integration with Kubernetes, target use cases, scalability, community support, and deployment flexibility within different infrastructure environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KubeDB
KubeDB
Portworx
Portworx

With the introduction of StatefulSet, it became easy to run a docker container for any database. But what about monitoring, taking periodic backups, restoring from backups or cloning from an existing database? KubeDB is a framework for writing operators for any database...

It is the cloud native storage company that enterprises depend on to reduce the cost and complexity of rapidly deploying containerized applications across multiple clouds and on-prem environments.

-
Data Mobility; Backup, recovery, migration made easy; High Availability; Scheduler-based Automation; Data Security; Anything, Anywhere.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
271
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
84
Stacks
10
Stacks
21
Followers
28
Followers
58
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Nomad
Nomad
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
IBM DB2
IBM DB2

What are some alternatives to KubeDB, Portworx?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot