Scylla vs Symas LMDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
Scylla and Symas LMDB are both popular database technologies, but they have key differences that set them apart. Let's explore the main distinctions between these two databases.
-
Performance: Scylla is optimized for high performance and low latency, making it ideal for real-time applications requiring fast response times. On the other hand, Symas LMDB is designed for efficient data storage and retrieval, making it well-suited for applications with a heavy read workload.
-
Consistency Model: Scylla follows a tunable consistency model, offering a range of consistency levels to suit different use cases. In contrast, Symas LMDB provides strong ACID-compliant consistency by default, ensuring data integrity at all times.
-
Data Model: Scylla is a wide-column store, supporting flexible schema design and horizontal scalability through sharding. Symas LMDB, on the other hand, is a key-value store that excels at handling large volumes of simple data pairs efficiently.
-
Data Distribution: Scylla employs automatic data distribution and replication across nodes in a cluster for fault tolerance and high availability. Symas LMDB operates on a single-node architecture, although it can be combined with other technologies for distributed setups.
-
Storage Engine: Scylla uses a log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) storage engine, optimized for fast writes and efficient compaction. Symas LMDB utilizes a B+Tree storage engine, providing fast key lookups and range scans with minimal disk I/O.
-
Community Support: Scylla boasts a vibrant open-source community with regular updates and contributions from developers worldwide. In comparison, Symas LMDB is supported by a dedicated team of experts, offering commercial support and consulting services for enterprise deployments.
In Summary, Scylla and Symas LMDB differ significantly in performance optimization, consistency model, data model, data distribution, storage engine, and community support.