LogDevice vs NanoLog | What are the differences? | StackShare

LogDevice vs NanoLog

Overview

LogDevice

Stacks7

Followers35

Votes0

NanoLog

Stacks7

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.3K

Forks366

LogDevice vs NanoLog: What are the differences?

LogDevice: Log storage for high-durability low-latency streaming use cases (by Facebook). LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file; NanoLog: A Nanosecond Scale Logging System. It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice and NanoLog can be primarily classified as "Logging" tools.

LogDevice and NanoLog are both open source tools. It seems that LogDevice with 1.55K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub has more adoption than NanoLog with 538 GitHub stars and 33 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Log Management on StackShare

Auditum

Log Management

Audit log management system for any application

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

LogDevice	NanoLog
LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.	It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.
-	Nanosecond scale logging system for C++;Exposes a simple printf-like API; Achieves over 80 million logs/second ; Enables low latency logging by deduplicating static log metadata
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 366
Stacks 7	Stacks 7
Followers 35	Followers 7
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Python Linux C++

What are some alternatives to LogDevice, NanoLog?

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

Zap

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.