StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Loki vs uno

Loki vs uno

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

uno
uno
Stacks29
Followers51
Votes0
Loki
Loki
Stacks552
Followers328
Votes17
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.8K

Loki vs uno: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between Loki and uno.

  1. Target Audience: Loki is predominantly used in the field of video editing, animation, and production, while uno is designed for creating documents, presentations, and spreadsheets.

  2. Features: Loki offers advanced video editing tools like special effects, transitions, and animations, whereas uno provides various templates, fonts, and formatting options for documents creation.

  3. Compatibility: Loki is compatible with various video formats and suitable for multimedia projects, whereas uno is compatible with Microsoft Office formats and ideal for business and academic purposes.

  4. Collaboration: uno offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple users to edit and view documents simultaneously, whereas Loki does not have such collaboration capabilities.

  5. Cost: Loki may require a one-time purchase or subscription for full access to all features, while uno may offer a free version with limited features and a premium version with additional functionalities.

  6. Learning Curve: Loki may have a steeper learning curve due to its complex editing tools, whereas uno is user-friendly and easy to navigate, making it accessible to individuals with varying levels of technical skills.

In Summary, Loki and uno differ in their target audience, features, compatibility, collaboration options, cost, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

uno
uno
Loki
Loki

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
Stacks
29
Stacks
552
Followers
51
Followers
328
Votes
0
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Opensource
  • 3
    Very fast ingestion
  • 3
    Near real-time search
  • 2
    Low resource footprint
  • 2
    REST Api
Integrations
No integrations available
Grafana
Grafana
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to uno, Loki?

Seq

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Log4j

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

Zap

Zap

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

SwiftyBeaver

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana