MapTiler vs Mapbox

Overview

Mapbox

Stacks803

Followers939

Votes113

GitHub Stars1.9K

Forks384

MapTiler

Stacks19

Followers59

Votes5

MapTiler vs Mapbox: What are the differences?

Introduction:

MapTiler and Mapbox are both popular mapping platforms that offer a wide range of services. While they have similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart from each other. This markdown code will highlight these differences in a clear and concise manner.

Data Sources: MapTiler primarily uses OpenStreetMap (OSM) data as its main data source, while Mapbox offers a more diverse range of data sources, including OSM as well as other proprietary and third-party data sources. This difference in data sources can affect the level of detail and accuracy available in the maps generated by the platforms.
Map Styling: Mapbox provides a highly customizable map styling system, allowing users to create and design maps with a wide range of visual options. MapTiler, on the other hand, has a more limited set of styling options, which may be more suitable for users who prefer a simpler and streamlined approach to map design.
Pricing: The pricing models of MapTiler and Mapbox also differ. MapTiler offers a more straightforward pricing structure, with fixed prices for specific services or data usage. Mapbox, on the other hand, uses a flexible pricing model that takes into account factors such as the number of users, map views, and additional features. This difference in pricing models can influence the cost-effectiveness and scalability of using either platform.
Developer Tools and Libraries: Mapbox provides a rich set of developer tools and libraries, making it easier for developers to integrate mapping functionalities into their applications and websites. MapTiler also offers developer tools, but the selection and capabilities may not be as extensive as those provided by Mapbox. The availability of robust and user-friendly developer tools can significantly impact the development process and overall user experience.
Third-Party Integrations: Mapbox has established integrations with a wide range of popular applications and services, such as Uber, Snapchat, and Foursquare, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate maps into their existing workflows. MapTiler, although it supports integration through APIs, may not have the same level of integration partnerships as Mapbox. The availability of third-party integrations can greatly enhance the usability and functionality of the mapping platform.
Community and Support: Mapbox has a large and active community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for troubleshooting and development. MapTiler also has a community, but it may not be as extensive or active as Mapbox's community. The strength and size of the community can affect the availability of support and the speed at which issues and bugs are addressed.

In summary, the key differences between MapTiler and Mapbox lie in their data sources, map styling options, pricing models, developer tools and libraries, third-party integrations, and the size and activity of their respective communities. These differences can impact the level of customization, functionality, and support available to users, making each platform more suitable for specific use cases and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Mapbox, MapTiler

StackShare

Apr 4, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."

183k views183k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mapbox	MapTiler
We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.	It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.
Develop mobile and web applications with Mapbox.js, our open-source JavaScript library.;Build native applications on iOS with the Mapbox iOS SDK or on iOS and OS X with MBXMapKit.;Build native applications for Android. Use Mapbox, OpenStreetMap, and other tile sources in your app, as well as overlays like GeoJSON data and interactive tooltips.;SSL maps	Satellite imagery; Drones; Precision agriculture.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 384	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 803	Stacks 19
Followers 939	Followers 59
Votes 113	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 28 Best mapping service outside of Google Maps 22 OpenStreetMap 15 Beautifully vectorable 11 Fluid user experience 8 Extensible	Pros 2 Vector tiles 1 OpenStreetMap 1 Custom map design (colors, fonts, etc) 1 Affordable
Integrations
No integrations available	fancybox Nuclino Here Maps Anvil OpenStreetMap

What are some alternatives to Mapbox, MapTiler?

Google Maps

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

OpenLayers

An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

LocationIQ

Free and Fast Geocoding Service

Stadia Maps

We enable devs to contextualize their data on a map and build complicated apps involving routing, time zones, and more with our APIs. We hate billing surprises as much as you, and if you send us an email, you'll get a real human reply.

CARTO

The CARTO platform empowers everyone, from business analysts to data scientists, to turn location data into business outcomes. We accelerate innovation, power new use cases and disrupt business models through Location Intelligence.

Related Comparisons

MapTiler vs Mapbox: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Data Sources: MapTiler primarily uses OpenStreetMap (OSM) data as its main data source, while Mapbox offers a more diverse range of data sources, including OSM as well as other proprietary and third-party data sources. This difference in data sources can affect the level of detail and accuracy available in the maps generated by the platforms.
Map Styling: Mapbox provides a highly customizable map styling system, allowing users to create and design maps with a wide range of visual options. MapTiler, on the other hand, has a more limited set of styling options, which may be more suitable for users who prefer a simpler and streamlined approach to map design.
Pricing: The pricing models of MapTiler and Mapbox also differ. MapTiler offers a more straightforward pricing structure, with fixed prices for specific services or data usage. Mapbox, on the other hand, uses a flexible pricing model that takes into account factors such as the number of users, map views, and additional features. This difference in pricing models can influence the cost-effectiveness and scalability of using either platform.
Developer Tools and Libraries: Mapbox provides a rich set of developer tools and libraries, making it easier for developers to integrate mapping functionalities into their applications and websites. MapTiler also offers developer tools, but the selection and capabilities may not be as extensive as those provided by Mapbox. The availability of robust and user-friendly developer tools can significantly impact the development process and overall user experience.
Third-Party Integrations: Mapbox has established integrations with a wide range of popular applications and services, such as Uber, Snapchat, and Foursquare, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate maps into their existing workflows. MapTiler, although it supports integration through APIs, may not have the same level of integration partnerships as Mapbox. The availability of third-party integrations can greatly enhance the usability and functionality of the mapping platform.
Community and Support: Mapbox has a large and active community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for troubleshooting and development. MapTiler also has a community, but it may not be as extensive or active as Mapbox's community. The strength and size of the community can affect the availability of support and the speed at which issues and bugs are addressed.

MapTiler vs Mapbox

Overview