StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Pure

Material Design for Angular vs Pure

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pure
Pure
Stacks36
Followers120
Votes61
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

Material Design for Angular vs Pure: What are the differences?

# Material Design for Angular vs. Pure

Material Design for Angular and Pure are both popular design systems used for creating visually appealing web applications. However, they have key differences in terms of functionality and features that cater to different needs.

1. **Component Library**: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of pre-designed components that are ready to use, making it easier to build consistent and responsive interfaces. On the other hand, Pure offers a more minimalistic approach with a smaller selection of components, ideal for projects that require a lightweight design system.
  
2. **Theming Support**: Material Design for Angular includes a robust theming system that allows developers to easily customize the appearance of components to match their brand identity. Pure, while also supporting theming, has less flexibility in terms of customization compared to Material Design for Angular.

3. **Animation and Interactivity**: Material Design for Angular emphasizes animation and interactivity to provide a more engaging user experience. It offers a wide range of animations and transitions out of the box. In contrast, Pure focuses more on simplicity and might have fewer built-in interactive elements compared to Material Design for Angular.

4. **Accessibility Features**: Material Design for Angular places a strong emphasis on accessibility, ensuring that components are usable by individuals with disabilities. It provides guidance on creating inclusive designs and adheres to accessibility standards. Pure also promotes accessibility, but it may not have the same level of detailed guidelines as Material Design for Angular.

5. **Community and Support**: Material Design for Angular has a larger community of developers and resources available, making it easier to find support and guidance when working on projects. Pure, while still popular, might have a smaller community and fewer resources compared to Material Design for Angular.

6. **Customization and Flexibility**: Material Design for Angular offers a high level of customization options, allowing developers to tweak and extend components to suit their specific needs. Pure, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of how extensively components can be customized and extended.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive component library, advanced theming support, and a focus on animation and accessibility, catering to projects that require rich interactive experiences. On the other hand, Pure offers a minimalist design approach with a smaller component selection, ideal for lightweight projects with simpler needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pure
Pure
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

Pure is meant to be a starting point for every website or web app. We take care of all the CSS work that every site needs, without making it look cookie-cutter.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs;A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues;Consistently styled buttons that work with <a> and <button> elements;Styles for vertical and horizontal menus, including support for dropdown menus;Useful form alignments that look great on all screen sizes;Various common table styles;An extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize;Responsive by default, with a non-responsive option;Easy one-click customization with the Skin Builder;Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
36
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
120
Followers
9.6K
Votes
61
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Responsive
  • 10
    Simple
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 4
    Pure
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Pure, Material Design for Angular?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase