StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design vs Semantic UI

Material Design vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Material Design
Material Design
Stacks594
Followers890
Votes14

Material Design vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Material Design and Semantic UI are two popular front-end frameworks used in web development. While both frameworks aim to make designing beautiful and functional websites easier, they have key differences that designers and developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Design Philosophy**: Material Design follows Google's design principles, focusing on simplicity, clean typography, and vibrant colors. Semantic UI, on the other hand, emphasizes readability and ease of use, with a more compact design aesthetic that prioritizes information hierarchy.

2. **Component Library**: Material Design offers a comprehensive library of pre-built components, including buttons, cards, and navigation bars, designed to work seamlessly together. Semantic UI also provides a wide range of components, but they are more customizable and modular, allowing developers to mix and match elements more freely.

3. **Customization Options**: While Material Design has a distinct visual style that may be difficult to deviate from, Semantic UI offers more flexibility in terms of customization. Developers can easily modify the look and feel of Semantic UI components to better fit the brand or aesthetic of a particular website.

4. **Community Support**: Material Design benefits from the vast resources and community support of Google, making it easier for developers to find tutorials, plugins, and solutions to common problems. Semantic UI also has a strong community, but it may not be as extensive as that of Material Design.

5. **Documentation**: Material Design provides extensive documentation and guidelines on how to use its components effectively, ensuring a consistent user experience across different platforms. Semantic UI documentation is also robust, but it may require more exploration to fully understand the framework and its capabilities.

6. **Browser Compatibility**: Material Design is optimized for Google Chrome and may not display as intended on other browsers. Semantic UI, on the other hand, aims for cross-browser compatibility, ensuring a consistent user experience across different platforms and devices.

In Summary, Material Design and Semantic UI offer distinct design philosophies, component libraries, customization options, community support levels, documentation quality, and browser compatibility, making them suitable for different project requirements and design preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, Material Design

Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments
Ashish
Ashish

Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software

Dec 29, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapMaterial DesignMaterial DesignTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

735k views735k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Jan 3, 2021

Review

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

307k views307k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Material Design
Material Design

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
594
Followers
1.5K
Followers
890
Votes
673
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
Cons
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Material Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase