StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Micronaut Framework vs Node.js

Micronaut Framework vs Node.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Stacks186
Followers330
Votes52

Micronaut Framework vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Micronaut Framework and Node.js are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. However, there are key differences between these two frameworks that developers should consider when choosing one for their projects.

  1. Architecture: Micronaut Framework is a JVM-based framework that follows a layered architecture, separating the presentation layer, business logic layer, and data access layer. On the other hand, Node.js is a runtime environment that uses a non-blocking, event-driven architecture, making it ideal for building scalable, real-time web applications.

  2. Language: Micronaut Framework is primarily written in Java and Kotlin, leveraging the robustness and maturity of the Java ecosystem. In contrast, Node.js uses JavaScript as its programming language, which is popular among web developers and provides a lightweight approach.

  3. Performance: Micronaut Framework is known for its low memory footprint and fast startup times. It achieves this by dynamically generating necessary code during compilation, reducing the need for runtime reflection. Node.js, on the other hand, utilizes single-threaded, non-blocking I/O to handle concurrent requests efficiently.

  4. Scalability: Micronaut Framework employs the use of microservices and supports distributed systems, making it highly scalable. It provides features like service discovery, load balancing, and fault tolerance out of the box. Node.js, while it can handle a large number of concurrent connections, may face scalability challenges with heavy computational loads due to its single-threaded nature.

  5. Ecosystem: Micronaut Framework benefits from the vast Java ecosystem, with numerous libraries, frameworks, and tools available. It seamlessly integrates with existing Java technologies, making it easier for Java developers to adopt. Node.js has its own ecosystem with a wide range of modules available through the npm package manager, providing a rich set of tools for building web applications.

  6. Community and Support: Micronaut Framework is backed by Object Computing Inc. (OCI) and has a growing community of developers. It provides professional support and documentation to assist developers. Node.js also has a large and active community, with strong community support forums and extensive online resources available.

In summary, Micronaut Framework and Node.js differ in their architecture, language, performance, scalability, ecosystem, and community support. Choosing between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Node.js, Micronaut Framework

abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments
Zubair
Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL


Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

  • Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
  • Peer to peer Selling of used items
  • Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry
290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js
Node.js
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

-
build testable microservice ; build serverless applications; JVM based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
186
Followers
164.5K
Followers
330
Votes
8.5K
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Pros
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
Cons
  • 3
    No hot reload
Integrations
No integrations available
GraalVM
GraalVM
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Groovy
Groovy

What are some alternatives to Node.js, Micronaut Framework?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase