Microsoft Fast Design vs Polymer: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Microsoft Fast Design and Polymer based on their key differences.
-
Component Model: Microsoft Fast Design follows the component model approach where components are built using a combination of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Polymer, on the other hand, utilizes Web Components, allowing developers to create reusable custom elements by encapsulating HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
-
Browser Support: Fast Design is built specifically for the Edge browser and provides improved performance and interactions in that browser. In contrast, Polymer is built to work across different browsers since it relies on Web Components, which are natively supported in modern browsers and can be polyfilled for older ones.
-
Documentation and Community: Fast Design has limited documentation and community support compared to Polymer. Polymer offers extensive documentation, guides, and a large community of developers who are actively contributing to its development and providing support through forums.
-
Maturity and Adoption: Fast Design is a relatively new framework and hasn't gained widespread adoption compared to Polymer. Polymer has been around for several years and has been used in production by various companies, making it more mature and widely adopted.
-
Tooling and Ecosystem: Fast Design has limited tooling and ecosystem compared to Polymer. Polymer provides a set of tools, such as Polymer CLI and Polymer Devtools, which assist in development and debugging. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party elements and libraries that can be used to extend its functionality.
-
Styling Approach: Fast Design follows a more traditional CSS approach for styling components. Polymer, on the other hand, encapsulates styles within components using Shadow DOM, which provides better style isolation and prevents style conflicts between different elements.
In Summary, Microsoft Fast Design and Polymer have key differences in their component model, browser support, documentation/community, maturity/adoption, tooling/ecosystem, and styling approach.
